lol if the violence was unacceptable, why aren't you doing an investigation into pardoning the J6 people?
Your transition from the "anti-Beamer" sports guy to a political pundit has been very rough.
We understand why you had to make the transition for troll survival, but it's been really rough.
Cleaning up the Biden Administration's abandonment of Americas continues.
Trump knows what happened to CA.
His conditions for actual relief other than the $700/pp check that Biden sent them:
1) Get Voter ID in Your State
2) Turn on the Water
Basically, he's telling Newsom and the corrupt Democratic apparatus to stop the shenanigans.
Over 80% of voters in CA want Voter ID.
The unvaccinated still have to deal with some undesired consequences (shedding) from the vaccinated. Thanks again, Fauci.
----------
Peters et al. found that women with daily close proximity (within 6 feet) to vaccinated individuals outside their household had:
- 34% higher risk of heavier bleeding.
- 28% higher risk of menstruation starting over 7 days early.
- 26% higher risk of bleeding lasting more than 7 days. The authors concluded,
“Our findings suggest possible indirect transmission of ingredients or products of the COVID-19 vaccines, presumably through shedding, from people who received one or more of the COVID-19 injections.”
https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/113
That decision to hire 85,000 more IRS staff seems especially stupid now that we know even today's "AI" can be made to do the exact same kind of work many IRS agents do.
And of course you are going to downplay my substantial credentials since you don't have any other than working for some unnamed govt agency doing God knows what. BTW, due to the weather my trash wasn't picked up yesterday. Can you get over here today and take care of that?
This is laughable. The dumbest "online survey" possible. Even dumber is the person who posts it.
"Peters" did not find that women with daily close proximity to vaccinated individuals" - There was no way to tell if only women even filled out this "online survey"
The "editor in chief" of this joke of a publication is a former linguistics professor.
1) An online survey conducted by an anti-vaccine group
2) No verification made as to who filled out the survey. The reader has to take their word for it. That's not proper for actual research.
3) The average age of the people (they say women but we have no proof of that) that filled out the survey is 37.8. It's well known that women in their late 30's experience more instances of irregular periods. Numerous actual research articles explain this in-depth and can be easily read online.
3) The survey itself says they took the word of the people that choose to fill out the survey. There was no verification, no medical documentation- just the word of people who filled out an online survey sponsored by an anti-vaccine group.
4) The people filling out the survey were supposedly "indirectly exposed" to people who they believe took the COVID vaccine (but had no proof).
5) "Indirect exposure" is defined as "within 6 feet" of a vaccinated person but this is a random distance and there is no explanation as to how the individual would know someone else actually had taken a vaccine.
This is akin to a survey filled out by Clemson fans about how much they like Clemson and the survey admitting that "Clemson fans served as their own control group"
This is not remotely scientific in any sense of the word.
Only a world class idiot would think this is legitimate or even post it as if it was- and yes- the kind of idiot you call an idiot right to their stupid face in person.
God, you are the dumbest person on this site and that's a real accomplishment.
I think the IRS commissioner saying that they are going to use AI to process returns, audit returns of Americans would be about the stupidest thing one could do given the concerns that Democrats and Republicans have about AI right now- and the minefield that they have talked about with regards to privacy concerns at this point in history
Talk about a dumb move.... wow.
and given the fact that it's unlikely that taxpayers that do need help from the IRS want to talk to a damn computer program- one that many don't trust right now..
and given that part of the increased funding for the IRS has been to upgrade their technology that 3 commissioners in a row have said was at least 40 years old.
With that said, AI certainly might be doing the job in 10-15 years but the guardrails aren't there right now. AI might be doing almost all jobs in 15-20 years. We don't know yet.
So, your suggestion would have been really nuts 2-3 years ago when they sought money to include the ability to hire a lot of new employees over the next 10 years when an estimated 40-50,000 were to retire or leave.
Yes you were. You were responding to my post about the $85 billion, then you made the stupidest comment ever on this forum when you said the $85 billion in NEW money was to replace EXISTING workers. You've just proven just how stupid you are.I wasn't talking about $85 billion. You have to be the dumbest asswipe around.
your credentials aren't worth shit and I'd tell you that face to face. You are a liar.
Just like you lied about "under Biden we had no tariffs"
Another lie by you. That's all you are.
The national average gas price is $3.12. Here, where I live, the lowest price is $2.77.Where is @Forever Fowl and all of his deep-seated wisdom as we watch the fall of horrific Progressive Policy and begin to try to wrap our minds around all of the damage it has done across the globe?
If I remember correctly, his last comments were tying Trump to Hannibal Lector.
He thinks standing out by the mailbox on the first of every month waiting for that check and snap card Makes him a gov employee. Lol. Wonder if that Obama phone is still working,Well, now you are just flat out lying. But that is what you resort to when you have no logical argument.
In response to my post discussing the $85 billion additional funding here is what you said in post #1148:
"The IRS was and is deeply understaffed. Tens of thousands of retirements and the inability and funding to replace employees.
Trump's own IRS Commissioner advocated for drastic increases in IRS funding to replace employees that had left, especially customer focusing employees."
Then in post 1230 you doubled down with this:
"The 87,000 IRS agents figure comes from a U.S. Treasury Department estimate of the level of hiring needed to maintain IRS efficiency and keep up with retirements and other staff declines over at least a 10 year period. "
Then in post 1233 you triple downed on your lie:
"People leave and retire."
"people die
people retire
People leave
People get other jobs
People quit"
And of course you are going to downplay my substantial credentials since you don't have any other than working for some unnamed govt agency doing God knows what. BTW, due to the weather my trash wasn't picked up yesterday. Can you get over here today and take care of that?
Yeah! When you skip people’s homes because of a “particular sign” in one’s yard, you’re pretty much worthless.
No you wouldn’t LOL! You better love Trump! He’s making fuel cheaper, so you can fill up your boat! Or! You can keep paying 3$ for marine fuel and give the rest to SC for NIL!I wasn't talking about $85 billion. You have to be the dumbest asswipe around.
your credentials aren't worth shit and I'd tell you that face to face. You are a liar.
Just like you lied about "under Biden we had no tariffs"
Another lie by you. That's all you are.
No you wouldn’t LOL! You better love Trump! He’s making fuel cheaper, so you can fill up your boat! Or! You can keep paying 3$ for marine fuel and give the rest to SC for NIL!
Yeah! When you skip people’s homes because of a “particular sign” in one’s yard, you’re pretty much worthless.
The national average gas price is $3.12. Here, where I live, the lowest price is $2.77.
The current rate of inflation as of January 15, 2025, is 2.9%.
The rate of unemployment as of December 2024 is 4.1%.
The Dow closed at 43,487.83 on January 17, 2025.
We still have a constitutional democracy.
We still have both Medicare and Social Security.
We will take a look at this in four years.
She's always had a thing for Gavin Newsom.
He's taller than Trump and that pisses him off.
Did you see the shoes Trump was wearing when he greeted Newsom? They were those thick heeled shoes he wears a lot to make him look taller.
Each day, Trump continues to clean up all of Biden's messes. What a disaster he was. History will not look fondly on him.
Why? This is a strange comment from a straight man. Are you attracted to Gavin? He's a psycho and he's helped ruin California.She's always had a thing for Gavin Newsom.
He's taller than Trump and that pisses him off.
Did you see the shoes Trump was wearing when he greeted Newsom? They were those thick heeled shoes he wears a lot to make him look taller.
Why? This is a strange comment from a straight man. Are you attracted to Gavin? He's a psycho and he's helped ruin California.