I have never understood standing behind a stagnant coach or a new one that is not improving. If you higher a new coach and in 2 years you don’t see improvement it’s time to move on. Waiting an entire recruiting cycle has never made since to me.
How so would that be stupid to get rid of dabo? He has shown a disregard for moving the way college football is moving. I believe the transfer portal is super important and so is over signing. So far he has pushed back on both. The turnover rate for players is going to increase rapidly. Better to go along with the change than fight it. In 4 years if Dabo is still not willing to change and stays stagnant, he doesn’t deserve to be fired? Just because he won 2 NC Clemson should have to pay him for a result they are not getting? How does that make sense?
So, you're saying that Clemson should fire Dabo this year b/c of one poor season, in spite of having made the playoffs every year since its inception and winning 2 titles?