No, I wasn't injecting politics into the discussion. It was more hyperbole. My issue is that when the governing body refuses to enforce the rules equally (or at all), we really don't gain anything by being goody two shoes, except for maybe a self-congratulatory pat on our back.
The programs that are serious about winning don't mind pushing the envelop and bending/breaking the occasional rule (Not law. There's a big difference.) Why? Because it works.
Don't believe me? Just look at what's been going on in Mark Emmert's NCAA. Cam Newton, Johnny Manziel and UNC walks scot free because they basically lawyered up. Penn State (and I believe Miami) had their penalties basically overturned because of NCAA overreach. And now a gunshy NCAA won't touch Clemson, despite all sorts of evidence and self-implication.
But wait! There's more! Mizzou was found to have committed infractions on a MUCH smaller scale and cooperated every step of the way, to the point of the NCAA gushing over them in public. So what happened? Of course, they hit Mizzou with the maximum penalties. Even the COI spokesperson admitted that they were probably sending the message that cooperating with them is now a bad thing.
Conclusion: The NCAA lacks the ability and/or willpower to fight schools that lawyer up and refuse to cooperate and are basically sending the message that it's now a free for all. Since nice guys finish last (like us), we might as well play the game as it is. And stop trying to play the game we wish we could.
The NCAA is just as crooked as some of these teams. Clemson is now in position (With their recent success) to keep the NCAA paid off. I think the ACC pools their money together to keep the NCAA from sniffing around. Think about what UNC did and not a thing happened.