Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
UK loves him the most...Clemson, Georgia, and UNC think he’s doing a great job.
Yeah, not sure using message boards as a gauge of fan dissatisfaction is wise...Tanner stated that the upset fans are probably a very vocal minority. WOW!! The arrogance of a truly worthless AD. This man is clueless!
Tanner stated that the upset fans are probably a very vocal minority. WOW!! The arrogance of a truly worthless AD. This man is clueless!
Clemson, Georgia, and UNC think he’s doing a great job.
Nice change....just in the nick of time.I have zero confidence in Ray as an AD.
we can settle this once and for all, saturdays game it will be first come first served, if you are not happy with muschamp sit on the east side, happy sit on the west side, neutral sit in north or south stands. Note: there will be overflow seating on the east side in different locationsTanner stated that the upset fans are probably a very vocal minority. WOW!! The arrogance of a truly worthless AD. This man is clueless!
we can settle this once and for all, saturdays game it will be first come first served, if you are not happy with muschamp sit on the east side, happy sit on the west side, neutral sit in north or south stands. Note: there will be overflow seating on the east side in different locations
UK and A&M tooClemson, Georgia, and UNC think he’s doing a great job.
OMG! Say it isn't so. I was afraid of that. He's just covering his ass for making such a stupid hire in the first place, at least, that's my hope because behind the scenes he's working very hard to fix this problem. NOT. My W/E has gone to hell and that's two W/Es in a row.
I could add Will, the OC, the DC and the S&C coach to that list. ST coach seems to be doing his job. He's about the only one.I have zero confidence in Ray as an AD.
Well the other comment is true too. No one will ever convince me that Riley used the USC job for experience to get the Oklahoma job. That doesn’t even make sense.Nice change....just in the nick of time.
No one said he used it for experience. Stoops simply told Riley he was leaving after the year and that the job was his if he stayed....that was plenty enough as Riley immediately withdrew his name from consideration despite having a good interview.Well the other comment is true too. No one will ever convince me that Riley used the USC job for experience to get the Oklahoma job. That doesn’t even make sense.
That’s not how it all went down, that’s only part of the story. Ray said he liked Riley but he wanted someone with head coaching experience and recruiting experience especially in the SEC. Stupid statement on his part but that’s Ray for you. Ray had the next great up and comer but let him get away and people want to make excuses for that boondoggle. Show the man money and MAKE him tell you no. He didn’t.No one said he used it for experience. Stoops simply told Riley he was leaving after the year and that the job was his if he stayed....that was plenty enough as Riley immediately withdrew his name from consideration despite having a good interview.
I know the primary individual from the BOT who was involved. The Chairman was the athletic department liaison for the Board and while Tanner wanted someone with SEC experience, Riley within days of his return to OU removed his name from consideration. Regardless of what Tanner's ideal candidate was, it didn't cause the loss of Riley. Riley was simply offered a better opportunity period.That’s not how it all went down, that’s only part of the story. Ray said he liked Riley but he wanted someone with head coaching experience and recruiting experience especially in the SEC. Stupid statement on his part but that’s Ray for you. Ray had the next great up and comer but let him get away and people want to make excuses for that boondoggle. Show the man money and MAKE him tell you no. He didn’t.
Don’t you think Ray told him he wasn’t going to get the job when he was here in Columbia and that’s why he withdrew his name? Ray and the BOT aren’t the best at hiring people and they’ve displayed their incompetence many times, not just with the football search. I would ask your BOT friend why in the blue heck they approved not one but TWO raises and an absurd buyout for Muschamp.I know the primary individual from the BOT who was involved. The Chairman was the athletic department liaison for the Board and while Tanner wanted someone with SEC experience, Riley within days of his return to OU removed his name from consideration. Regardless of what Tanner's ideal candidate was, it didn't cause the loss of Riley. Riley was simply offered a better opportunity period.
You can make up whatever you want out of wholecloth, but no Tanner didn't tell him he wasn't getting the job. Tanner liked him....a lot. It was far from a foregone conclusion that he wouldn't get the job. We nor OU had the time to put together a financial offer. Stoops simply made the offer of the HC position and Riley jumped at it. Period. Frankly, he would have been an idiot not to.Don’t you think Ray told him he wasn’t going to get the job when he was here in Columbia and that’s why he withdrew his name? Ray and the BOT aren’t the best at hiring people and they’ve displayed their incompetence many times, not just with the football search. I would ask your BOT friend why in the blue heck they approved not one but TWO raises and an absurd buyout for Muschamp.
Yeah, not sure using message boards as a gauge of fan dissatisfaction is wise...