Auburn
- Thread starter CockyinNoVa
- Start date
They lost to Nc state, they would curb stomp miss state though just like UNC will Satterfield’s offense tomorrow.
Well, maybe they should have curb stomped NC State like Miss St did instead of getting their ass beat.
Clemson barely squeaked by a 7-5 team tonight with nobody opting out. Miss St by a TD with all their players.
Haha then that means Miss State would beat us by almost as much as Georgia right?
So miss state beats Clemson by 7, more
than Georgia did, does that mean Miss State would beat Georgia too since you are claiming they would beat Clemson worse than Georgia did.
You see how stupid your logic is yet. You have the mind of a child I swear. No wonder our rivals think we have stupid fans.
Well, Miss St beat TAMU at TAMU, beat UK by 2 TDs, and destroyed Vandy. So, they would definitely beat us.
So answer the other part Einstein, they would beat Clemson by 7, according to you, and UGA beat clemson by 3 soooo Miss State > UGA using your logic. See how crazy your mind is.
edit: UGA beat Clemson by 7, so you’re saying they are equal to Miss St That’s just as crazy.
I said nothing about scoring and football algebra. That's all you. If that were the case, I would be saying Miss St by 21, since Miss St won by 14 and Clemson lost by 7.
So, that is YOUR idiotic logic, not mine, Einstein.
I just simply stated that Miss St would beat them by 7. Miss St's offense was better than Clemson's offense against tougher teams.
Your entire argument was because nc state beat Clemson and lost to miss state, then miss state would beat Clemson. I’m done wasting time on your crazy ass. The more you post the more you make people believe in stupid, cause you keep proving it.
Start making your list of excuses you will be espousing after tomorrows beat down. Have fun Gomer!
Last edited:
Keep telling yourself that.
If they can't curb stomp NC State, the same team that Miss St DID curb stomp, and if they can't curb stomp Iowa St, they sure as hell aren't curb stomping a Miss St team with all their players.
Your reading comprehension is obviously not very strong. Sure, everything has to be considered, but a 6-7 team is not a good team. Would you like to put asterisks next to the games that Auburn should have won? That doesn’t matter in the record books going forward. It’s hilarious that you are wasting so much energy to promote Auburn as a good team. I can’t imagine any Auburn fan would fight for that distinction. As a matter of fact, they probably want to forget this season altogether.
Well said and right on point. It still won’t get through that coconut head he has.
My reading comprehension is fine. It's your logic that isn't very strong.
You can say they are terrible based solely on wins\losses and then turn around and say that we haven't had massive improvement this year when we ended up winning 50% our games instead of 20% of them. I matter who you play and how you play them. Period.
You know there's just a chance - a chance, mind you - that he's been trolling us all the time. Is that remotely possible? I'd rather believe that than the alternative.
We can hope but there is a lot of crazy in the world and he’s doing a damn good job of proving it.
No, I just don't have a bias against Beamer and his staff like you and others, and I don't spin everything in order to crap on our team at every opportunity.
You can't have it both ways. Who you play and how you play them either matters or it doesn't.
I'll repeat. You can't have it both ways. Who you play and how you play them either matters or it doesn't.
You can't crap on our team's improvement despite the record because you don't think the win were good enough and then turn around and say the team we played are terrible based solely on a record.
You are a hypocrite troll with an agenda.
Nah, you're trolling. You have to be. Shame on me for not seeing it sooner. I wasted way too much effort and time trying to convince someone who was playing me and others all the time. That's on me. The one thing I won't do now that I've seen my mistake is to continue making it. Happy trolling!
No, you are the real troll. NO true Gamecock fan acts like you did when we were kicking Florida's ass. You were disgusted and upset that Florida didn't show up.
Go read the Florida game thread and look at his obvious displeasure when we started kicking Florida's ass.
And the biggest "hole" here is YOU.
Nothing but a hypocrite troll that spins everything negative against our team.
I didn't miss anything. You don't have a "point". Just hypocritical anti-Gamecock, anti-Beamer spin.
You are just too, how can I say it, EASY!
Keep going, I said 85% previously, hell at this rate you might hit that 90% number here soon.
Last edited:
What are you talking about? Are you talking about Auburn or South Carolina?
Again, your reading comprehension!! Where did I say that Auburn was terrible?
You are just too, how can I say it, EASY!
Keep going, I said 85% previously, hell at this rate you might hit that 90% number here soon.
Like I said, we won six games, made a bowl, Beamer is still here, Satterfield is still here, and we have 2 great new QB coming in. And I very happy about the Auburn and Florida wins.
You or imaginary 85% can keep "laughing" with your incessant crying whining. I'll keep loving it. Nothing is more pleasing than to see a bunch of crybaby haters get proven wrong.
Pretty sure you said they are "not a good team" based solely on their wins and losses. Since you want to split hairs, what are they?
Yep you Keep proving us wrong with losing seasons Bucko, and next year and the next and the next. I’m glad you are loving bad football, you are easy to please but that’s not surprising one bit.
Splitting hairs?
1. You said they were a good team
2. I said that they are NOT a GOOD team
3. I never said they were a terrible team
4. There is a difference between a team that is ‘not a good team’ and a ‘terrible team’
Last edited:
Send this to your boy Satterfield, although I’m sure you have already peppered him with your “love letters” 😂
Ok, you say they are not good. I say they are good. King Hater claims they aren't even respectable.
I say there are plenty of "good" teams that would have dropped to "not good" if judged on the simpleton win\loss logic here if they played Auburn's schedule.
That is pure speculation. Actually it’s just fantasy. Your argument is based on ifs and buts, not on reality. Do you realize how ridiculous you sound? You are actually arguing that wins and losses don’t mean as much as ‘who you played and how well you played’!!
No, it's not fantasy. It's absolutely reality.
That's why an undefeated UCF never gto a chance to play for the National Championship despite being the only undefeated team that season.
If only wins and losses matter, then why didn't UCF play for the National Championship?
Who and how you play absolutely matters. The members of CFP committee have openly stated that. They even consider critical injuries when making judgments.
Nothing stupid at all. It's FACT.
Wow. Trolling is in your blood. Look, Ward. Why would I not have anticipated that he would move the goal posts after losing the argument.
Ok, Einstein. That UCF team. If they have 1 loss on their record, does that make a difference? It makes all the difference in the world. Wins and losses are still the most important measure of success in football. All a team can do is win all their games. Auburn didn’t do that. They didn’t even win half of them. They are NOT a good team.
Of course it matters if you are a P5 team, who you play and how you play. But you can’t say that a 6-7 Auburn team is somehow equal to another 10-3 team, just because they had a tougher schedule. It’s delusional.
