The specific thing was about the indemnity clauses which be acknowledged he was wrong about. He’s also shared an article attributing the vaccine to a 2017 death which he later pulled after it was pointed out when the individual died. Again though the problem is that people never pick up on his correction because they don’t fit the story they want to create with him at the center.
I get that the “Big Pharma” buzzword is one of the latest boogeymen to just throw out there but logically is you have a population that is more prone to hospitalizations to start they will still be likely to end up with hospitalizations. I know that it’s not as cool as simply repeating click bait saying 60% of hospitalizations are vaccinated but sometimes it doesn’t hurt to look into what makes up the numbers to see what that really means. It also doesn’t account for overall numbers and how those have changed or whether or not that age group saw the same level of spikes as others.
No vaccines have never immediately eradicated an illness and as we’ve moved further and further away from issues with the things people are vaccinated for people tend to forget this. It was stupid to give any pitch that it would stop the vaccine because that’s not what the studies for this or any vaccine has shown. Again though while I know the change in definition has allowed people to latch onto something vaccines never completely stopped the transmission prior either. It was noted that many smallpox infections were passed along by vaccinated individuals. So again if that was a take of the prior definitions then that was wrong.
