After being awarded a legacy of something award she gave a speech that included a firm commitment to DEI and liberal-think. Although most of her speech was very good, she couldn’t help herself in getting into the liberal gobbledygook.
It happens way too often. I believe she's incentivized to include these talking points. That's how the game works.After being awarded a legacy of something award she gave a speech that included a firm commitment to DEI and liberal-think. Although most of her speech was very good, she couldn’t help herself in getting into the liberal gobbledygook.
Incentivized how?It happens way too often. I believe she's incentivized to include these talking points. That's how the game works.
Kickbacks and favoritism. The progressives have their chosen leaders in many fields who are part of the club. It's well known Hollywood is DEI incentivized and this why much of their content blows today. This extends out to industry leaders. The message is simple -- If you want to stay on top, you need to follow the rules.Incentivized how?
After being awarded a legacy of something award she gave a speech that included a firm commitment to DEI and liberal-think. Although most of her speech was very good, she couldn’t help herself in getting into the liberal gobbledygook.
She was giving her opinion. It's good to see.
It's interesting watching people embrace sports stars, pastors, anyone else that gets political and speaks their mind if they agree with them- and at the same time rage at those that have a different opinion.
It's like the old videos of Laura Ingraham on Fox telling Lebron to shut up and dribble and that sports stars need to keep their political opinions to themselves (as if that has ever been a thing in American history- it hasn't) while at the same time promoting athletes with right wing opinions on her show and Fox in general.
NopeCNN and FOX News are all but dead Dave. It happened quite awhile ago.
Nope
So capitalism at work then?? is that a problem for some folks?? Incentivism is what capitalism is at the end of the day. Just like doing a commercial for some piece of crap product you never use and don't believe in right? Happens every day and by fine people. Nothing to see here. Next...It happens way too often. I believe she's incentivized to include these talking points. That's how the game works.
That's only part of the equation. It's the DEI component and promoting those who either aren't qualified or less qualified. Ward Jr posted a perfect example from yesterday above.So capitalism at work then?? is that a problem for some folks?? Incentivism is what capitalism is at the end of the day. Just like doing a commercial for some piece of crap product you never use and don't believe in right? Happens every day and by fine people. Nothing to see here. Next...
Those chicks had no idea what they were doing. What happens when you go WOKE
That's only part of the equation. It's the DEI component and promoting those who either aren't qualified or less qualified. Ward Jr posted a perfect example from yesterday above.
Dawn picking people based on skin color as usual…..
Who gets to say someone isn't qualified and have it mean anything?
My 3rd job- which was in the profession I actually wanted to be in (first 2 weren't) was given to me- I found out later- because my supervisor felt like I'd fit in the group better (a group of 4 other white guys with virtually identical backgrounds).
I had no experience in the profession, and he told me I failed his interview questions related to the job pretty badly. I didn't find that out until he was about to retire and we had a going away party and he told each of us in his group something that he had never told us before. I still remember not having a clue in the interview what he had asked me. He actually laughed a bit at a few of my answers-which were funny looking back- but I didn't mean them to be funny- a story I've told to my family too many times.
That's only part of the equation. It's the DEI component and promoting those who either aren't qualified or less qualified.
I think most people know choosing someone because of the color of their skin is wrong. It's odd to me that you want to defend it when Staley does it though.
It's also interesting how many people who'd never pick a non-white person for anything would write the same statement.I think most people know choosing someone because of the color of their skin is wrong.
Never saw any evidence Dawn chooses anyone just based on their skin color. That's because she doesn't.
At my company, DEI is a very strong program. Has nothing to do with hiring. It's an educational program.
I'll post the DEI topics of our company from a few months ago as an example.
Her recruiting classes would certainly show disparate impact.
so, a white coach who has an almost entirely black team would also be described the same way by you?
(Yes, I'm thinking of several off the top of my head so just wanting to make sure you are entirely consistent)
Why are you trying to change the subject?
Your intellectually disingenous argument style is comical.
I noticed you dodged the question. Let's try again
So, a white coach who has an almost entirely black team would be described the same way by you as focusing just on skin color? Simply seeing how consistent you are. If you aren't consistent, that's worth noting in the discussion.
Her recruiting classes would certainly show disparate impact.
given we won the national title
Why do you want to hurt the team and sign the unqualified to meet some quota that makes you feel better because their skin color is "right" per you.
With 3 national titles, Dawn has proven she recruits the best for our program and team- and she wins with her choices.
I'm only familiar with Dawn's recruiting. Can you give us the breakdown of her recruiting demographics over the past 15 years compared to the recruiting of her peers?
Shocker, moving the goal posts again. Especially when you're using the argument that people of certain races just aren't good enough for the job...
I'm not going to give a 15-year recruiting breakdown to anyone.
What you really mean is, "I can't prove my point because the data will prove me wrong."
What you really
no, what I mean is I'm not going to take the time to look up 15 years of recruiting data- especially for players that we offered but didn't come here which would likely be impossible to find.
That's unreasonable and everyone knows that.
But no- I don't take orders from anyone.
But I did post 4 white players above that we targeted and offered in 2024 and didn't land. That was easy to find since it's current info. That seems to be more relevant and of course that info, in no way, backs up your ludicrous view.
your pathetic.
Imagine if courts allowed racist employers to say, "Well we tried! People of certain racists just don't want to work for us!"
It's on the organization to recruit better.
Leave it to you to post really stupid, illogical comparisons
Courts don't force employees to work for employers. It's their choice. Courts do care if employers intentionally don't hire people based on their skin color.
But of course none of that applies here.
College basketball teams aren't employers. They are athletic teams.
As I pointed out above and you ignored because you can't stand it, we offered at least 4 white players in 2024 alone (probably more but I got tired of looking up the info).
So none of your stupid theories make any sense. They aren't rational and don't match up with the facts.
It's a shame you don't realize when you resort to this stupidity it ruins your credibility for every other argument.
It's ok to admit you're wrong at times and that Dawn needs to be more inclusive.