I see what you did there.well, here's hoping that WM is our next AD.
Needs to beat Clemson first.well, here's hoping that WM is our next AD.
Other than Tanner, when has this happened?Seems to happen when we have a successful coach.
He would make a good one also. I say whichever one is coaching better, let that one continue to coach. Let the other one be AD.well, here's hoping that WM is our next AD.
Why would he? He's got a pie job and he can make sure he hires the coaches that will keep his records intact.Ray Tanner is not the retiring type
Correct. When RT was at the point in his coaching career that DS is at currently, he had already been doing lots of additional athletic department type work. Has she (not in any way a criticism, one way or the other)?Has she ever expressed interest in that? Your post makes it seem like the Tanner to AD thing came out of nowhere when he was on the record years before saying that was his ultimate goal, he was taking steps to train for it etc.
I wish we would encourage our successful coaches to remain coaches and let the MBAs run the AD.
On further reflection, DS strikes me more as someone who enjoys mentoring young women rather than getting involved in athletics administration/logistics.I've never heard Dawn express an interest in administration. As an aside, if Frank ever went elsewhere, what would you think of the possibility of her coaching MBB?
Excellent post.
Hindsight on Ray's move from coaching baseball to the Athletic Directorship: the school, baseball program, and Athletic Department would have been better off if he had remained in coaching.
Seems to happen when we have a successful coach.
That's not the future. That's the present.I'm guessing in the future you'll see less former coaches and more career administrators become ADs. Just like you are seeing less former professors and more career administrator/fundraiser types become college presidents now
Good research.That's not the future. That's the present.
Florida's AD: not a former coach. Neither was his predecessor.
Georgia's AD: not a former coach. Neither was his predecessor.
Auburn's AD: not a former coach. Neither was his predecessor.
Texas A&M's AD: not a former coach. Neither was his predecessor.
Arkansas' AD: not a former coach. Neither was his predecessor.
Ole Miss' AD: not a former coach. Neither was his predecessor.
Missouri's AD: not a former coach. Neither was his predecessor.
Kentucky's AD: not a former coach. Neither was his predecessor.
Vanderbilt's AD: not a former coach. Not sure about his predecessor. Who cares? It's Vanderbilt.
Alabama's AD: not a former coach. His predecessor was, but hadn't been in a long time.
LSU's AD: not a former coach. His predecessor was, but a long and interesting story of hardball politics is why that happened.
Mississippi's State's AD is a former coach. His predecessor wasn't.
Tennessee's AD is a former coach. His predecessor wasn't, and Fulmer got hired because UT was having an athletic administration implosion.
Using other coaches as an indicator, somebody desperate will draw him back into coaching after his dabbling in broadcasting wears off. Dawn could do the same thing.On further reflection, DS strikes me more as someone who enjoys mentoring young women rather than getting involved in athletics administration/logistics.
I think we'd be more likely to see her following the lead of Andy Landers on ESPN.
Using other coaches as an indicator, somebody desperate will draw him back into coaching after his dabbling in broadcasting wears off. Dawn could do the same thing.
Wanna bet ????She won’t be able to be AD while she’s coaching MBB and WBB.![]()
Wanna bet ????
I never bet against Dawn
I guess I was fooled by the hair dye. But Dawn's career is open-ended.Andy Landers isn't going back into coaching at his age.
Except that RT was done with coaching.
I do agree that especially at the mid-major and above level, the AD should not be HC of any sport. Too many responsibilities, and the potential conflict of interest of favoring one sport over another (see Dietzel-McGuire-Carlen conflicts).
Ray Tanner is not the retiring type
That's a long way of saying "good point coolcock2001"!That's not the future. That's the present.
Florida's AD: not a former coach. Neither was his predecessor.
Georgia's AD: not a former coach. Neither was his predecessor.
Auburn's AD: not a former coach. Neither was his predecessor.
Texas A&M's AD: not a former coach. Neither was his predecessor.
Arkansas' AD: not a former coach. Neither was his predecessor.
Ole Miss' AD: not a former coach. Neither was his predecessor.
Missouri's AD: not a former coach. Neither was his predecessor.
Kentucky's AD: not a former coach. Neither was his predecessor.
Vanderbilt's AD: not a former coach. Not sure about his predecessor. Who cares? It's Vanderbilt.
Alabama's AD: not a former coach. His predecessor was, but hadn't been in a long time.
LSU's AD: not a former coach. His predecessor was, but a long and interesting story of hardball politics is why that happened.
Mississippi's State's AD is a former coach. His predecessor wasn't.
Tennessee's AD is a former coach. His predecessor wasn't, and Fulmer got hired because UT was having an athletic administration implosion.
Dawn as AD? No. Best to stick to what you know you do well. Imagine there have been a few days these last few years where Ray has wished he was still in the dugout