Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don't worry we are about to be guinea pigs for Beamer.in SEC recruiting. 91st.
The closest to us is Ole Miss at 53.
Im aware of the defections but WOW!
Please find us a great coach!!!
We lost like 6 recruits in the past week or so and have no idea who our coach will be next year. This is not surprising to me..in SEC recruiting. 91st.
The closest to us is Ole Miss at 53.
Im aware of the defections but WOW!
Please find us a great coach!!!
He just waxed our tails pretty good with his scrubs.We lost like 6 recruits in the past week or so and have no idea who our coach will be next year. This is not surprising to me..
It IS surprising Lane is 53rd though! I though he was a “can’t miss hire” and top skill position talent would “flock to Ole Miss to play for him”... At least that is what folks around here said last year when they were clamoring for Muschamp to be fired and campaigning for Lane to be hired... He has been there this whole cycle... What is Ole Miss’ excuse?
What does that have to do with his recruiting sucking?He just waxed our tails pretty good with his scrubs.
Don't worry we are about to be guinea pigs for Beamer.
Well, we had to fire a coach who already wasn't recruiting very well. We've lost a few commits who might be swayed when we have a new coach. And you never know who the incoming coach might bring. But it's probably just going to be a lean class. Hopefully, we get some bodies at the positions of most need (WRs, DBs and LBs)
We were in the 40s before the defections... Not impressive at all but better than the 90s. I think most expected us to hold onto most of what we had without a change.. Who knows right? Our recruiting was certainly not going well and certainly was a contributing factor to the change.Even if we didn’t lose recruits, who really thinks we would rank much higher than 93rd based on the product currently being put out there?
You talking about the lane that put half a hundred on us? That lane?We lost like 6 recruits in the past week or so and have no idea who our coach will be next year. This is not surprising to me..
It IS surprising Lane is 53rd though! I though he was a “can’t miss hire” and top skill position talent would “flock to Ole Miss to play for him”... At least that is what folks around here said last year when they were clamoring for Muschamp to be fired and campaigning for Lane to be hired... He has been there this whole cycle... What is Ole Miss’ excuse?
The same, and again as I just asked above- what relevance does that have to the subject at hand= Lane sucking at recruiting at Ole Miss..You talking about the lane that put half a hundred on us? That lane?
The NEW Beamer Ball! A snow ball headed for hell!Don't worry we are about to be guinea pigs for Beamer.
Yeah and probably get five fed to keep boboDon't worry we are about to be guinea pigs for Beamer.
in SEC recruiting. 91st.
The closest to us is Ole Miss at 53.
Im aware of the defections but WOW!
Please find us a great coach!!!
It's not just you.Truth be told, we were guinea pigs for Muschump because McClendon and T-Rob were both rookies put into there respective positions and received over $1 million each. But that is just me
USCALUMNI
in SEC recruiting. 91st.
The closest to us is Ole Miss at 53.
Im aware of the defections but WOW!
Please find us a great coach!!!
Why would WM promote two totally unqualified rookies in the tough SEC? Was against the BMac promo from start. Thought WM would help rookie DC. RT must have given WM a heads up about the undeserved buyout he was gonna get so WM's attitude was-Why should I work hard when I can get fired and be a multi-millionaire?Truth be told, we were guinea pigs for Muschump because McClendon and T-Rob were both rookies put into there respective positions and received over $1 million each. But that is just me
USCALUMNI
He wont be at Ole Miss in 5 years. If he is losing they will fire him. If he is winning he will leave for another job.We lost like 6 recruits in the past week or so and have no idea who our coach will be next year. This is not surprising to me..
It IS surprising Lane is 53rd though! I though he was a “can’t miss hire” and top skill position talent would “flock to Ole Miss to play for him”... At least that is what folks around here said last year when they were clamoring for Muschamp to be fired and campaigning for Lane to be hired... He has been there this whole cycle... What is Ole Miss’ excuse?
He wont be at Ole Miss in 5 years. If he is losing they will fire him. If he is winning he will leave for another job.
He wont be at Ole Miss in 5 years. If he is losing they will fire him. If he is winning he will leave for another job.
LOL. .... and sine you guys blasted those of us who said Tanner and Chump were ridiculous mistakes. Real what you sow boys. Deal.in SEC recruiting. 91st.
The closest to us is Ole Miss at 53.
Im aware of the defections but WOW!
Please find us a great coach!!!
Right. Eskimos are only going to buy so much ice. And buy the end, Muschamp was trying to sell doo-doo ice.Even if we didn’t lose recruits, who really thinks we would rank much higher than 93rd based on the product currently being put out there?
Both Ole Miss, and USC, are quite alike. Both are stepping stones jobs. Or stepping out jobs, depending on the situation
I don't know why people who were coming for the coach would be any less likely to bail if the coach was let go following the final game. That's still before the early signing day.According to 247, we are:
And, we would be
- Last in the SEC
So, we are ahead of only 2 teams in the entire Power 5 (TCU and Oregon State).
- Last in the ACC
- Last in the Big 10
- Next to last in the Big-12
- Next to last in the Pac-12
We would also be
Firing the HC mid-season was a dumb move, IMO.
- #8 in the AAC
- #8 in the M-West
- #7 in the MAC
- #5 in the Sun Belt
- #4 in C-USA
So which coach was it that used us as a stepping stone? I love the way everyone says that but there is no truth to it. Someone wins here, they will stay here.
Losing is failure and prolonged failure does that to people and organizations - and that even applies to churches.we have the most self loathing loser mentality here. I don’t know how that came about.
Sure, and we weren't very high before the firing. It was a no winner either way. Sign a class that wasn't going to get it done or change coaches and take a gamble.According to 247, we are:
And, we would be
- Last in the SEC
So, we are ahead of only 2 teams in the entire Power 5 (TCU and Oregon State).
- Last in the ACC
- Last in the Big 10
- Next to last in the Big-12
- Next to last in the Pac-12
We would also be
Firing the HC mid-season was a dumb move, IMO.
- #8 in the AAC
- #8 in the M-West
- #7 in the MAC
- #5 in the Sun Belt
- #4 in C-USA
They can time the firing and hiring more closely (assuming they have their ducks in a row... big assumption given this administration...) so the recruits can see who the new coach is before they choose to bail.I don't know why people who were coming for the coach would be any less likely to bail if the coach was let go following the final game. That's still before the early signing day.
If recruits like the hiring part well enough, they will give us a serious chance. If they don't, they ain't coming anyway. Whatever helps the hiring part the most is what ought to concern us the most.They can time the firing and hiring more closely (assuming they have their ducks in a row... big assumption given this administration...) so the recruits can see who the new coach is before they choose to bail.