Lmao
You are quite factually wrong. Not even a matter of opinion, and you still cant just say "oops, that was wrong".
That says a LOT about your pathetic little life.
Does Napier make it through the week?
- Thread starter GoCocksFight2021
- Start date
Lmao
You are quite factually wrong. Not even a matter of opinion, and you still cant just say "oops, that was wrong".
That says a LOT about your pathetic little life.
LOL.
Trump won.
Beamer ties Spurrier for most wins in first 4 years.
8 wins that almost nobody thought was possible.
Beamer making you and taterwatson look like the troll monkey fools you are.
Life is WONDERFUL.
Trump won.
Beamer ties Spurrier for most wins in first 4 years.
8 wins that almost nobody thought was possible.
Beamer making you and taterwatson look like the troll monkey fools you are.
Life is WONDERFUL.
LMAO
What does any of that have to do with you claiming Napier would be fired?
The fact that you can't admit to being wrong about something so small says a LOT about your pathetic little life, lady.
Last edited:
Hey, you figured out the quote function! That's at least one small step for you.
Lmao
Still has nothing to do with you claiming Napier would be fired.
The fact that you can't admit to being wrong about something so small says a LOT about your pathetic little life, lady.
The fact that you are so obsessed with it and everything I post shows exactly how pathetic your troll monkey life is.
8 wins must REALLLY be killing you. I love it.
8 wins must REALLLY be killing you. I love it.
As far as deflections go, this is not one of your best.
And still has nothing to do with you claiming Napier would be fired.
The fact that you can't admit to being wrong about something so small says a LOT about your pathetic little life, lady.
If my life is so pathetic, then why do you care what I post and obsess over my every word?
That's even more pathetic.
That's even more pathetic.
Again, an extremely weak deflection.
It's entertaining how much you'll twist in the wind rather than concede one small admission.
The fact that you can't admit to being wrong about something so small says a LOT about your pathetic little life, lady.
So he's 2-0 all time against Beamer and UF has a better record than us against common opponents, but they're in misery?
Oh. So SOS matters but UF playing a harder SOS than us doesn’t matter?
South Carolina and Florida both have top 10 schedules. Florida's is a little tougher. Army had somewhere around the 90th toughest schedule, so comparing their 9 wins to our 8 wins or Florida's 6 win is stupid.
But let's not forget, Florida has FAR more talent than South Carolina. Almost TWICE as many 4 star players. Beamer has definitely done WAY more with less than Napier. And it's not even close.
ESPN has UF as #2 and us at #12. There could be a sizable gap between those two even though they're only 10 spots apart.
But more importantly, we have 4 common opponents. UF went 3-1 and we went 2-2. Impossible to argue they haven't done better than us against common opponents.
It was only a matter of time before Army would be totally annihilated by a real football team. The pollsters play the stupid ratings game knowing some teams will eventually get blown away.
Napier barely hung on, but survived. But next year he returns 9 starters on defense and 9 on offense. Lagway is one of the best young qb around. Things are looking good. Admittedly the $10,000,000 deal for Underwood at Michigan may make it hard to keep Lagway. Sigh of relief if Napier.
Florida has the 12th most talent roster in the nation. We are at #21.
Napier only beat ONE team with more talent than Florida. Beamer beat THREE teams with more talent than SC.
Napier lost to TWO teams that had less talent than Florida. Beamer lost to ZERO teams that had less talent than SC.
And like I said, the talent levels aren't even close.
ESPN Power Rankings
https://www.espn.com/college-football/fpi
South Carolina - #16
Florida - #25
Army - #54
Find a new angle for your troll.
I'm impressed how well you speak English considering Russian is your first language, but we were discussing strength of schedule rankings.
