I just don't understand what Beamer would be able to sell to recruits? He has nothing to show recruits and this time he can't use Spurrier as a selling tool. I just don't see this ending well.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm in the same boat, er, uh, age group. That's how I feel. With all my aches and pains, I'm not sure I have more than a couple of years left anyway.You should relax. In the first place, you have no hand in the situation. In the second, you and I are too old to benefit for very long - if at all. Our day has passed. Let the young people worry and obsess.
"Go Rest High On That Mountain".I'm in the same boat, er, uh, age group. That's how I feel. With all my aches and pains, I'm not sure I have more than a couple of years left anyway.
I'm still thinking that more suitable alignment should be considered. I'm surprised we haven't been asked to move on.Freeze may help us win right away, but it is so short-sighted. Neal Brown seems like he would be a good hire. I don't know how Beamer would do, but he could be a home run. Or he could be a bust and we would win 3 games a year.. you know, like we are now.
I agree with dizzy. Freeze has done nothing under normal conditions to warrant an offer from USCI’m still trying to get the fascination with Freeze. He was mediocre at Ole Miss while cheating and has beaten 2 teams with a winning record while at Liberty.
If your criteria is just someone who may have won at Ole Miss I’d rather pursue David Cutcliff. Essentially the same record there with no NCAA violations.
Don't get me wrong, I want a good clean ran football program for all Gamecock fans to point to as a source of pride. But, I also want to win some games, if it comes down to Beamer, Napier or Freeze I'm willing to give Freeze a chance. Because of the three aforementioned, I think Freeze would give us the best chance to win. We could also say, hey Liberty gave him a chance and his performance was outstanding for the Flames so we are going to give him a chance, too.
That was the following year.It's neither here nor there at this point in time but wasn't LSU next in line for Herman if he had turned Texas down. In other words we would have been his 3rd choice if I'm not mistaken. It's just one of those things I am curious about.
Good point.Beamer is the highest risk. He has never been a head coach.
I'm in the same boat, er, uh, age group. That's how I feel. With all my aches and pains, I'm not sure I have more than a couple of years left anyway.
I'm sure I do too, Freddie. But, boy oh boy, I sometimes feel my age.Well, I've got more than a couple of years so I am going to show concern.