I am on record....jokes or not....I'm positive we have a many cousins/wives/mom/dads/protectors on here that are only 1 year into Gamecock football because they are coach first/USC second in 100% of their comments.I thought it was his wife? 😁
I am on record....jokes or not....I'm positive we have a many cousins/wives/mom/dads/protectors on here that are only 1 year into Gamecock football because they are coach first/USC second in 100% of their comments.I thought it was his wife? 😁
Having to be "right" is pretty much the definition of petty and immature.
Besides, plenty of good players decided to play for Muschamp. That didn't make him a good coach. We'll see how Satterfield does next year. He'll get one more shot.
I've had to see a ton of petty and immature stupid comments from a few of these clowns when it comes to Beamer and Satterfield.
These clowns deserve every bit of the ridicule directed at them. Maybe they will learn to treat our coaches fairly and give them a chance instead of rushing to judgement and bashing them incessantly. the
I am on record....jokes or not....I'm positive we have a many cousins/wives/mom/dads/protectors on here that are only 1 year into Gamecock football because they are coach first/USC second in 100% of their comments.
To be fair...I didn't want him fired after any adversity occurred...I wanted them all fired (save Lembo and SteppE) immediately after hiring because this job is not a guinea pig job. I know some outsiders think it is....but it is a proud, high level job that demands a stud in the seat.Some people just prefer to be fair to people instead of emotionally fragile snowflakes that just want to fire somebody at the first sign of adversity that anyone with a brain knew would be the case considering the circumstances.
I admit to getting a big kick out of some posters accusing others of being emotionally fragile snowflakes. The irony is thick enough to cut with a knife.
Keep howling, monkey.
![]()
To be fair...I didn't want him fired after any adversity occurred...I wanted them all fired (save Lembo and SteppE) immediately after hiring because this job is not a guinea pig job. I know some outsiders think it is....but it is a proud, high level job that demands a stud in the seat.
You're not throwing me off calling me a snowflake...most political affiliations on FGF are pretty transparent based off the way you view the Gamecock football program and debates made. Beamer is a victim, nobody gave him a chance, everything's great/ let's stick our heads in the sand. H#ll....you might actually be slow Joe B.
LOL at the Satterfield haters. The OC you wanted to fire landed us the highest rated QB to ever walk on campus.
THIS is why you give coaches the chance to get their players in and succeed instead of expecting them to turn a dumpster fire they inherited around in an unreasonable amount of time.
“highest rated ever”?
Uh, think some more on that.
No Gamecock fan in their right mind wants White fired. We had a solid and deep D line, but outside of that he was the coordinator that had very little to work with. He took what he had, coached them up, and exceeded expectations.What would he be a victim of? Winning more games in his first year that anybody thought he would? And he doesn't need a chance. He's already got it and performed way better than expected. Like I said, only a few howling internet monkeys feel otherwise, and the rest of the real world outside of their delusional bubble is laughing at them.
And I guess you wanted White fired too? That seems like great idea.
I agree. I don't want to see us waste 2-3 years on an OC that pretty much everyone can see isn't the answer. Would rather us take a flyer on a low-level high scoring OC than do another year of this ineptitude.No Gamecock fan in their right mind wants White fired. We had a solid and deep D line, but outside of that he was the coordinator that had very little to work with. He took what he had, coached them up, and exceeded expectations.
On the offensive side, we had the leading SEC rusher, a 4/5 star in Lloyd (nobody saw Z White or JuJu coming) coming back. We had a fairly experienced OL and TE room. Lacking a bit on receivers and QB. Offense could have and SHOULD have been a serviceable unit. IMO Satterfield/the offense didn't meet expectations, stats back that up.
Maybe I'm jaded by what I've seen in the past with Roper and McClendon. Both were kept too long, and neither should have been hired in the first place IMO considering we could have hired Kendall Briles (and other up-and-comer's) when he was available. If that makes me a howling monkey, I guess I am. We've got the money to pay a good OC that has a proven track record, so let's go get one. As I've said a few times here, if Beamer decides to stick with Satterfield, he knows more than I do, so I'll trust him. I just don't want to be at the same spot 2-3 years down the road (like Roper and McClendon) knowing what should have been done a year or two before and wasn't.
I agree. I don't want to see us waste 2-3 years on an OC that pretty much everyone can see isn't the answer. Would rather us take a flyer on a low-level high scoring OC than do another year of this ineptitude.
I heard he was following Lincoln Riley to USC and ended up on the east coast by accident. Sry that was too good to leave it alone.LOL at the Satterfield haters. The OC you wanted to fire landed us the highest rated QB to ever walk on campus.
THIS is why you give coaches the chance to get their players in and succeed instead of expecting them to turn a dumpster fire they inherited around in an unreasonable amount of time.
No Gamecock fan in their right mind wants White fired. We had a solid and deep D line, but outside of that he was the coordinator that had very little to work with. He took what he had, coached them up, and exceeded expectations.
On the offensive side, we had the leading SEC rusher, a 4/5 star in Lloyd (nobody saw Z White or JuJu coming) coming back. We had a fairly experienced OL and TE room. Lacking a bit on receivers and QB. Offense could have and SHOULD have been a serviceable unit. IMO Satterfield/the offense didn't meet expectations, stats back that up.
Maybe I'm jaded by what I've seen in the past with Roper and McClendon. Both were kept too long, and neither should have been hired in the first place IMO considering we could have hired Kendall Briles (and other up-and-comer's) when he was available. If that makes me a howling monkey, I guess I am. We've got the money to pay a good OC that has a proven track record, so let's go get one. As I've said a few times here, if Beamer decides to stick with Satterfield, he knows more than I do, so I'll trust him. I just don't want to be at the same spot 2-3 years down the road (like Roper and McClendon) knowing what should have been done a year or two before and wasn't.
That little bit we were lacking at QB (understatement of the year) and receiver (not as much) pretty much destroyed any chance of us have any type of balanced offense. I don't believe for a second anybody would have done much if any better. Maybe even worse. Harris dealt with injuries most of the season. C White had more to work on the Dline that could often cover for the linebackers and secondary. And when they didn't, we saw what happened.
But I think you are undervaluing how important the QB is to the offense. You have to give coaches an opportunity to fix what is wrong, and one year isn't even close to being enough, especially considering the year was far more successful that anticipated. If you can't throw the ball down field, defenses are going to pin their ears back and bring it all night. And if your QB can't make them pay, you are done. And if nobody respects your passing game, you have no chance at a running game.
And Kendall Briles wasn't available when Beamer was hired, so that not really anything to debate. Not that I think we would have done any better without a QB.
Took the words out of my mouth. We were better with Bobo the year before. Having said that, now I need to go wash my mouth out with bleach.Your entire write-up here pretty much is exactly why we need a new OC.
1) We weren't any better overall as an O in those positions last year but we were far and away better because of the OC. We had better pieces around the QB and a better QB, yet were pathetic on O.
2) Part of being a good OC is adapting your offense to your talent, not just continuing to do the same thing even if it won't work.
You think an OC like Elliot, Briles, Riley, etc wouldn't have been able to do more with this offensive talent? What about Malzahn? If you think others could have done more than why are you willing to accept Satt's performance? Stop the excuse making and expect to have a quality offense.
Ok padawan. I'm not even sure what you're talking about anymore.What would he be a victim of? Winning more games in his first year that anybody thought he would? And he doesn't need a chance. He's already got it and performed way better than expected. Like I said, only a few howling internet monkeys feel otherwise, and the rest of the real world outside of their delusional bubble is laughing at them.
And I guess you wanted White fired too? That seems like great idea.
If he is so great, why was he benched this year and relegated to second string?LOL at the Satterfield haters. The OC you wanted to fire landed us the highest rated QB to ever walk on campus.
THIS is why you give coaches the chance to get their players in and succeed instead of expecting them to turn a dumpster fire they inherited around in an unreasonable amount of time.
Hit the link and there are several good articles. Great Job!!
That doesn’t change the fact he was the top overall QB in the country when he came out of HS in 2019.If he is so great, why was he benched this year and relegated to second string?
Dizzy....AND yes he was a top recruit. He can play. Yes he got benched...but they have a DEEP QB room at OU so nothing to sneeze at. But...everyone should temper their expectations a little. I hope he runs an efficient offense, takes care of the ball and keeps us in positive plays/gains. He will NOT throw for 3,500 yards and put up Air Raid numbers (like ALL of the other guys that have run that offense in the last 20 years at OU).....because we are not running that offense. I think he could do well, and god I hope he does. But, we don't need to look at his previous numbers because they can't be compared with....whatever our offense is right now.That doesn’t change the fact he was the top overall QB in the country when he came out of HS in 2019.
His 2020 numbers prior to he being benched were better than what we have seen over the past couple years here though so even if his freshman season was his peak it’s still an improvement.
So your opinion matters more than a QB coach? Gotcha.Your argument is keeping Satt is why we got this QB. 1) that is a complete stretch based on hearsay from a QB coach. 2) keeping Satt to get Rattler is a poor way to run a program. 3) You ignore the connection the QB coach mentions before Satt's O. If there wasn't the connection from OU there is no reason for him to ever look at us. So again, Satt isn't why we got him nor should be why we keep Satt. No matter who the OC was, they would obviously say the OC was important to the decision.
The O, no matter who the QB is, isn't going to suddenly work based on anything we saw this year. It wasn't like we had WR's running wide open but the QB wasn't able to get them the ball. You can celebrate keeping a pathetic OC since you think it got us a QB recruit, but I will actually have expectations for the OC and not be ok with being ranked one of the worst offenses in the nation.
All of Beamer's momentum and work will be worthless if we keep this OC.
I don’t have any expectations that he’s going to shatter passing records but there are some key things you can look at. Last season he completed almost 75% of his passes and averaged about 8 yards per completion. Those are strong numbers and if that’s what we get then everyone should be happy. He also threw 11 TDs with 5 INTs which needs to be improved on but the prior year had 28 and 7 which is a much better ration and even if we see 20 and 5 people should be happy.Dizzy....AND yes he was a top recruit. He can play. Yes he got benched...but they have a DEEP QB room at OU so nothing to sneeze at. But...everyone should temper their expectations a little. I hope he runs an efficient offense, takes care of the ball and keeps us in positive plays/gains. He will NOT throw for 3,500 yards and put up Air Raid numbers (like ALL of the other guys that have run that offense in the last 20 years at OU).....because we are not running that offense. I think he could do well, and god I hope he does. But, we don't need to look at his previous numbers because they can't be compared with....whatever our offense is right now.
Right ...that's what I 'm saying. We don't have the weapons and more importantly the system in place for him to duplicate those numbers.I don’t have any expectations that he’s going to shatter passing records but there are some key things you can look at. Last season he completed almost 75% of his passes and averaged about 8 yards per completion. Those are strong numbers and if that’s what we get then everyone should be happy. He also threw 11 TDs with 5 INTs which needs to be improved on but the prior year had 28 and 7 which is a much better ration and even if we see 20 and 5 people should be happy.
My biggest concern is really whether or not we have the weapons and system around him to take advantage of what he can bring.
Do you mean about Beamer's connection mattering first? Or do you mean on the fact that I believe Satt is a bad OC?So your opinion matters more than a QB coach? Gotcha.
Sorry, High School no longer counts. This is Big Boy football.That doesn’t change the fact he was the top overall QB in the country when he came out of HS in 2019.
His 2020 numbers prior to he being benched were better than what we have seen over the past couple years here though so even if his freshman season was his peak it’s still an improvement.
I think with the right system, we have enough talent around him to be much better. However, to get the right system, we need to get a new OC.I don’t have any expectations that he’s going to shatter passing records but there are some key things you can look at. Last season he completed almost 75% of his passes and averaged about 8 yards per completion. Those are strong numbers and if that’s what we get then everyone should be happy. He also threw 11 TDs with 5 INTs which needs to be improved on but the prior year had 28 and 7 which is a much better ration and even if we see 20 and 5 people should be happy.
My biggest concern is really whether or not we have the weapons and system around him to take advantage of what he can bring.
I saw quite a few missed opportunities for big plays this season. A much better QB makes a huge difference, at least that was the story for the UF win.Your argument is keeping Satt is why we got this QB. 1) that is a complete stretch based on hearsay from a QB coach. 2) keeping Satt to get Rattler is a poor way to run a program. 3) You ignore the connection the QB coach mentions before Satt's O. If there wasn't the connection from OU there is no reason for him to ever look at us. So again, Satt isn't why we got him nor should be why we keep Satt. No matter who the OC was, they would obviously say the OC was important to the decision.
The O, no matter who the QB is, isn't going to suddenly work based on anything we saw this year. It wasn't like we had WR's running wide open but the QB wasn't able to get them the ball. You can celebrate keeping a pathetic OC since you think it got us a QB recruit, but I will actually have expectations for the OC and not be ok with being ranked one of the worst offenses in the nation.
All of Beamer's momentum and work will be worthless if we keep this OC.
That’s complete BS.I am on record....jokes or not....I'm positive we have a many cousins/wives/mom/dads/protectors on here that are only 1 year into Gamecock football because they are coach first/USC second in 100% of their comments.
Your entire write-up here pretty much is exactly why we need a new OC.
1) We weren't any better overall as an O in those positions last year but we were far and away better because of the OC. We had better pieces around the QB and a better QB, yet were pathetic on O.
2) Part of being a good OC is adapting your offense to your talent, not just continuing to do the same thing even if it won't work.
You think an OC like Elliot, Briles, Riley, etc wouldn't have been able to do more with this offensive talent? What about Malzahn? If you think others could have done more than why are you willing to accept Satt's performance? Stop the excuse making and expect to have a quality offense.
I saw quite a few missed opportunities for big plays this season. A much better QB makes a huge difference, at least that was the story for the UF win.
Took the words out of my mouth. We were better with Bobo the year before. Having said that, now I need to go wash my mouth out with bleach.![]()
Do you mean about Beamer's connection mattering first? Or do you mean on the fact that I believe Satt is a bad OC?
He starts with Beamer's connection mattering. Again, we shouldn't keep a shitty OC to get a QB recruit.
If it is the second, I believe my experience of coaching makes me as much if not more qualified than a lot of these QB coaches. I hate to break it to you, but most of these private and elite 11 QB coaches just do a bunch of pointless drills and don't know jack about schemes. I have had to correct so many fundamentals and poor QB knowledge with kids that are going to our local elite 11 QB coach. These guys just take their money and lie to them like used car salesmen.
We had better TEs and RBs this year. It’s arguable that our WRs as a whole were better this year even though none were as good as Shi Smith. To argue we had less talent is to ignore the facts. Then you bring in the fact we ended the 2020 season with limited numbers due to Covid and played 10 SEC games shows a lack of intellectual honesty. This doesn’t even get into the lack of spring and summer practices and install for 2020 season.LOL. What team were you watching? Either year.
You can "expect" in one hand and crap in the other, and see which one gets full faster. Doesn't change a damn thing on the field. Sometimes it's just jimmys and joes, and not Xs and Os.
Against the teams that we played in common both year, we scored the same numbers of TDs and almost the same number of points. And that was with less talent, not more. Not sure what offense you saw in the field last year, but it wasn't ours.
A much better QB makes a huge difference, at least that was the story for the UF win.