Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'll need a new pair of pants after that game if we do lolWe will beat them next season .
Asks the tater troll. Hahaha!You think we can beat Clemson next season?
Yeah, you'll need a new pair of orange overalls.I'll need a new pair of pants after that game if we do lol
Gators, Tennessee and UGA will all be tougher games than clemson in 2016. I think Georgia made a good hire in Smart, they just made a worst 'fire' running Richt off. Smart will do well at Georgia but no better and probably not as well as Mark Richt during his run.
To-date Muschamp's staff-building has been excellent, he's a wildfire, the players seem to like him ... he recruits well, we've got lots to offer and a pretty good upside. If we can get the best in-state guys to stay home and come here (passing on those who have 'baggage' or big-heads - clemson can have THOSE) we'll get our share from NC, GA and FL - plus hopefully 'branch out' far enough to be competitive for other region's better players.
In GA we need to get even better tied-in within 50-miles of downtown Atlanta, expand our presence in Houston and Bibb Counties, work south GA more to get those Moultrie and Valdosta guys interested in 'Carolina instead of FSU, GA Tech and UGA and work western GA to attract those guys near Columbus this way instead of towards Auburn and Alabama.
We need to stay on top of NC's targets and keep working the Tampa, Jacksonville and south Florida areas as hard as we can.
8-4 with a win over clemson will be a good 1st year after the implosion we suffered in 2015. No reason not to start winning 10+ each year after that with even deeper runs and a couple of championships in the year's to follow.
Baby steps ... but clemson ain't gonna' be our 'big worry' - in any year.
We've pulled even with clemson in the last decade. South Carolina football will never again be a push-over. We were a lousy 3-8 in 2015 after winning almost 50-games the previous 5-years and had clemson crapping in their pants before winning by 5-points. clemson is a very good 2nd-tier team, that's all. The Gamecocks will be fine over the next few years.
I'm thinking Florida on the road. Possibly UGA at home with that new quarterback Eason. He is the real deal. Obviously Florida in the swamp is never easy and I'm sure they will be significantly improved on offense next season. Thoughts?
I think UGA will be tougher than Clem. I don't think Tennessee will be as tough as any of those other three games though. But that's just me.Either Clempson at Clempson or Florida in the Swamp. There will be several other very tough games as well.
Soft schedule makes for a soft team. When we get back on track, you'll see the difference between the two conferences when we play them.
Lol, upstate. Everyone knows that you were never a new member. Heck, you had 500 posts on this site before it even existed! Chuck Norris wears upstate underwear! And on the rear end, it says "Clemsux!" Everyone bow to the greatest poster of all time! You make fun of someone new and their "expert" opinion, but I would listen to my dog's "expert" opinion over yours. What a tool.Happy anniversary, fear. You're now on day 2 on FGF! No longer will your member info show "joined today". It now says "joined yesterday". At least for 24 hours. You old timer, you. We are really going to value your expert opinions! Congrats!
Stop trolling. Geez. Clemson is the #1 seed in the playoff and the only undefeated team in the country, but yeah...they're "a very good 2nd-tier team".Gators, Tennessee and UGA will all be tougher games than clemson in 2016. I think Georgia made a good hire in Smart, they just made a worst 'fire' running Richt off. Smart will do well at Georgia but no better and probably not as well as Mark Richt during his run.
To-date Muschamp's staff-building has been excellent, he's a wildfire, the players seem to like him ... he recruits well, we've got lots to offer and a pretty good upside. If we can get the best in-state guys to stay home and come here (passing on those who have 'baggage' or big-heads - clemson can have THOSE) we'll get our share from NC, GA and FL - plus hopefully 'branch out' far enough to be competitive for other region's better players.
In GA we need to get even better tied-in within 50-miles of downtown Atlanta, expand our presence in Houston and Bibb Counties, work south GA more to get those Moultrie and Valdosta guys interested in 'Carolina instead of FSU, GA Tech and UGA and work western GA to attract those guys near Columbus this way instead of towards Auburn and Alabama.
We need to stay on top of NC's targets and keep working the Tampa, Jacksonville and south Florida areas as hard as we can.
8-4 with a win over clemson will be a good 1st year after the implosion we suffered in 2015. No reason not to start winning 10+ each year after that with even deeper runs and a couple of championships in the year's to follow.
Baby steps ... but clemson ain't gonna' be our 'big worry' - in any year.
We've pulled even with clemson in the last decade. South Carolina football will never again be a push-over. We were a lousy 3-8 in 2015 after winning almost 50-games the previous 5-years and had clemson crapping in their pants before winning by 5-points. clemson is a very good 2nd-tier team, that's all. The Gamecocks will be fine over the next few years.
I think that has already been seen. Rivalry hasn't gone too well for the sec lately. No reason to believe the sec is getting better.
Nice post #8, johnson! You sure seem know a lot about me, but only 8 posts? It's nice to know clemsux bothers you that much. Hilarious!!Lol, upstate. Everyone knows that you were never a new member. Heck, you had 500 posts on this site before it even existed! Chuck Norris wears upstate underwear! And on the rear end, it says "Clemsux!" Everyone bow to the greatest poster of all time! You make fun of someone new and their "expert" opinion, but I would listen to my dog's "expert" opinion over yours. What a tool.
If you didn't care, then why did you respond? Also, you proved my point when you referenced my post total. As if post total or duration of membership have anything to do with team affiliation or fandom. The term "Clemsux" doesn't bother me one bit. Stupid people bother me, i.e., you, and people like you. When I see or hear grown adults resorting to juvenile slurs repeatedly as their only means of argument, I associate it with low intelligence. I think most intelligent people would as well. So, I find it ironic that you try to use low IQ to belittle me, but not unexpected. I don't pretend to know you, and based on your posting habits, I'm rather glad I don't. But then that's my point isn't it. When all you post about is "Clemsux" this, or "Tater" that, and you don't add anything informative to a conversation, people just assume you're stupid. Either that, or you're the troll trying way too hard to disguise it. Either way, I'm sure you're winning at life.Nice post #8, johnson! You sure seem know a lot about me, but only 8 posts? It's nice to know clemsux bothers you that much. Hilarious!!
Yeah, I'm real concerned what you think about me. What a loser. Go back to taternet, they'll appreciate your drivel & they have about the same low IQ.
So if you don't like stupid people, you must hate yourself. You sure think you know a lot about me, but you're only on post #9? I know you don't like that I point that out, but it is important. You've either been banned before or you use multiple names. Probably the later since you're an expert on my postings. It took one post for you to show everyone you're a complete clemsux troll. Congrats.If you didn't care, then why did you respond? Also, you proved my point when you referenced my post total. As if post total or duration of membership have anything to do with team affiliation or fandom. The term "Clemsux" doesn't bother me one bit. Stupid people bother me, i.e., you, and people like you. When I see or hear grown adults resorting to juvenile slurs repeatedly as their only means of argument, I associate it with low intelligence. I think most intelligent people would as well. So, I find it ironic that you try to use low IQ to belittle me, but not unexpected. I don't pretend to know you, and based on your posting habits, I'm rather glad I don't. But then that's my point isn't it. When all you post about is "Clemsux" this, or "Tater" that, and you don't add anything informative to a conversation, people just assume you're stupid. Either that, or you're the troll trying way too hard to disguise it. Either way, I'm sure you're winning at life.
DUDE THE SIMPLE MATTER OF FACT HERE IS THAT IF ANYONE ON THIS SITE POSTS ANYTHING EVEN REMOTELY RATIONAL, RESPECTFUL OF CLEMSON, OR NOT WORSHIPING THE UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA, YOU, ALONG WITH ABOUT 5-6 OTHER GUYS HAVE A STROKE AND CALL CLEMSUX OR DUMBO LOVER OR SOMETHING COMPLETELY RIDICULOUS. GO JOIN THE INSIDERS FORUM IF YOU DON'T WANT TO HAVE AN INTELLECTUAL CONVERSATION HERE. End of rant. You get the picture.So if you don't like stupid people, you must hate yourself. You sure think you know a lot about me, but only you're only on post #9? I know you don't like that I point that out, but it is important. You've either been banned before or you use multiple names. Probably the later since you're an expert on my postings. It took one post for you to act like a complete clemsux troll. Congrats.
I's okay for you to call me a tool, but I not supposed to mention your low IQ? What am I typing? clemsux fans aren't logical or reasonable. I hope you enjoyed bashing me. I bet it makes your feel big inside, huh? clemsux little man syndrome. Constant need for recognition.
I go to the University of South Carolina and I'm 23 years old, and my maturity level is light years ahead of yours. I should be the one acting like a child, yet you seem to be surpassing me with flying colors. I just don't get it.So if you don't like stupid people, you must hate yourself. You sure think you know a lot about me, but you're only on post #9? I know you don't like that I point that out, but it is important. You've either been banned before or you use multiple names. Probably the later since you're an expert on my postings. It took one post for you to show everyone you're a complete clemsux troll. Congrats.
I's okay for you to call me a tool, but I not supposed to mention your low IQ? What am I typing? clemsux fans aren't logical or reasonable. I hope you enjoyed bashing me. I bet it makes your feel like a big boy inside, huh? clemsux little man syndrome. Constant need for recognition.
DUDE THE SIMPLE MATTER OF FACT HERE IS THAT IF ANYONE ON THIS SITE POSTS ANYTHING EVEN REMOTELY RATIONAL, RESPECTFUL OF CLEMSON, OR NOT WORSHIPING THE UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA, YOU, ALONG WITH ABOUT 5-6 OTHER GUYS HAVE A STROKE AND CALL CLEMSUX OR DUMBO LOVER OR SOMETHING COMPLETELY RIDICULOUS. GO JOIN THE INSIDERS FORUM IF YOU DON'T WANT TO HAVE AN INTELLECTUAL CONVERSATION HERE. End of rant. You get the picture.