We can get all the 4 and 5 stars in the world at the end of the day it's all about development. How well these guys develop as players will determine the success of this team.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We aren't the good guys they are just ask them they will tell you.Thus the late push, it was some rumor, Clemson did miss on some OL today, Gwyn is so good, maybe true, I'm glad he has signed with the good guys!
And their ranking is what 5 spots above ours? If this worries you maybe you should pull for CU but i never will.
We have 6 OL to their 2. And everyone knows that there are very few 4-5 star OL and is the most difficult position to evaluate. In other words, if you sign a lot of OL, you are going to have a lot of 3 stars....but try to run an offense without them.That's mainly due to the number of recruits difference. The Quality over Quantity is why they are way ahead. If they had the same amount of commits they would be top 3 easy. The fact ESPN has them 5th with only 15 is pretty ridiculous. And if you look at Rivals and click on the Avg Rating it puts it in perspective alil more, they are around 5th and SC 23rd based on Quality. Just a bunch of 3* recruits will add to the point total of the rankings and make it look better. Anyway just alil insight on how the ranking system works, I've always looked at it from the Quality aspect. But it still a solid class and have Feb to go.
Clemsons got like 7 seniors this year...don't need to recruit to many positionsWe have 6 OL to their 2. And everyone knows that there are very few 4-5 star OL and is the most difficult position to evaluate. In other words, if you sign a lot of OL, you are going to have a lot of 3 stars....but try to run an offense without them.
Hmmm, roster management an issue?!?Clemsons got like 7 seniors this year...don't need to recruit to many positions