Well, our Poor
- Thread starter ElectricalCock89
- Start date
Yes he did. No pardons for Merrick Garland, Jack Smith, and Christopher Wray. Or Michael Cohen.
Alvin bragg, letitia james, fani willis. Still Plenty of trash to take out after pressed to flip on the other's
I can see why he'd be going out not too happy with those guys though. I don't think any of them produced the kind of results he was looking for.
Most believe Biden had a Pardons-for-Pay Program in cases where they couldn't cause him any harm.
If that was case, the Vindman's (below) either didn't want to pay or didn't get the memo.
Otherwise, with over 8000 pardons, one would believe they would have to think they would have been on that list.
Garland, Smith, Wray and Cohen were difficult to pardon because it not only spoke directly to the Biden Family corruption itself, but also our legal system as a whole.
It would have signaled to the world that Trump was correct and they weaponized the DOD.
As amazing as it is, there's still a good part of the country who is buried in CNN/MSNBC and believes all of Biden's pardons were to protect the innocent from the dictator Trump coming after them.
The interesting thing with be if Patel & Co. sue to challenge these pardons OR bring these people that got pardoned in for questioning and they have to truthfully.
They can no longer plea the 5th with their pardon. And if they are caught lying under other, they are cooked.
Fun times ahead.
I doubt that would happen. You'd have a court telling a President they can't pardon someone. That court has never even hinted that it has such power as the constitution reserves that for the president. You'd have to have a court that ignores the plain language of the constitution on the power of pardons.
First, someone would have to have standing to make such an argument with the court and that would be very problematic and a very, very high hurdle. About the only obvious person would be someone pardoned by the President would make that argument and I doubt that would happen.
Some of you folks don't really read much and seem to make up stuff.
The Supreme Court, in 2023, ruled on a Trump brought case that Presidents are immune from prosecution for official acts and they defined official acts very, very generously. This would obviously include any pardon decisions a President makes.
There is a 0.0000000000000% chance Biden or any President would even need to pardon themselves from here on out- thanks to President Trump bringing such a case and getting a favorable ruling from a Republican court.
Might not include treason and Biden committed treason. Though I'm not sure they would want that precedent/stain on our legal system. However, Kash Patel is a badass and very well could press it. Who knows.
These people deliberately tried to run our country into the ground. Let's see if Trump & Co. go full court press.
He might not for the sake of trying to unify America.
However, if that wasn't in play, why wouldn't you go after these criminals who tried to jail and maybe kill you just to keep power?
He might not for the sake of trying to unify America.
However, if that wasn't in play, why wouldn't you go after these criminals who tried to jail and maybe kill you just to keep power?
Another big fat hoax is finished. Thank God. There's old ladies locked up that never even went in the building. Some spend significant time in solitaire. Those who set this all up should be in prison for life....but Biden pardoned them. Although Pelosi is at the heart of the matter and I don't think she received one.
Go Dexter on em all. Trump has pardon power now. They tried to kill him and failed
Costly mistake….,
Trump could have easily pardoned himself on Jan 7th after he knew the crooked were going to use J6 against him.
J6 was arranged because the people in charge KNEW they stole the election and needed both a smokescreen and a reason to get rid of Trump for good.
It was a clever plan. Most of Deep State's hoaxes have been clever as they work off half-truths which cause the misdirection and confusion within the public.
This is likely what happened in LA. Gavin didn't start the fires. He just set the perfect environment for them to happen and the winds played along.
J6 was arranged because the people in charge KNEW they stole the election and needed both a smokescreen and a reason to get rid of Trump for good.
It was a clever plan. Most of Deep State's hoaxes have been clever as they work off half-truths which cause the misdirection and confusion within the public.
This is likely what happened in LA. Gavin didn't start the fires. He just set the perfect environment for them to happen and the winds played along.
BOOM. You can't see it unless you click on this post but Community Notes just checked the FBI.
This is how you wake Gomers up.
----------------------------------------
Under the post it reads ----
"The FBI engaged in constant surveillance of King, and attempted to discredit/blackmail him to influence him to stop organizing. King's family believe the FBI was responsible for his death"
.https://www.npr.org/2021/01/18/956741992/documentary-exposes-how-the-fbi-tried-to-destroy-mlk-with-wiretaps-blackmail
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/FBI%E2%80%93King_letter
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/retropolis/wp/2018/03/30/who-killed-martin-luther-king-jr-his-family-believes-james-earl-ray-was-framed/
This is how you wake Gomers up.
----------------------------------------
Under the post it reads ----
"The FBI engaged in constant surveillance of King, and attempted to discredit/blackmail him to influence him to stop organizing. King's family believe the FBI was responsible for his death"
.https://www.npr.org/2021/01/18/956741992/documentary-exposes-how-the-fbi-tried-to-destroy-mlk-with-wiretaps-blackmail
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/FBI%E2%80%93King_letter
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/retropolis/wp/2018/03/30/who-killed-martin-luther-king-jr-his-family-believes-james-earl-ray-was-framed/
I've already said I want all Trump's nominees approved so we can watch the country burn together. I'm sad about Gaetz.
