LOL. I guess that's why blue states are the ones needing huge bailouts from the COVID relief package.
I know it's an old argument by now, but most of the taker states are red, not blue. You know that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LOL. I guess that's why blue states are the ones needing huge bailouts from the COVID relief package.
Democrats still had a former klan member in Congress in 2010.
Well buddy it’s already been tried. See the Soviet Union, Communist China, Venezuela, Cuba, Laos. Good luck!!
That's another reason why we need to separate. Then when the failed right comes crawling back, they have to agree to live by civilized rules.
Could you explain to us how the UK has a lower rate of rape than the US considering they don't have all the guns we have to prevent the rapes?
Yeah, we see what a great job Democrats have done in cities and other urban areas.
Cities like New York, LA, Chicago, Atlanta, and SEattle are the economic engines that prop up red state beggars.
Hahaha sure buddy.Cuba and Laos were destroyed by U.S. involvement. China seems to be doing pretty well economically.
Wow...please tell me you didn’t attend USCParties switched. Everybody knows that, even if some won't admit it.
Never happened, even though Democrats love to make that claim.Parties switched. Everybody knows that, even if some won't admit it.
Maybe so, but he freed them from the DemocratsI know. He disliked black people.
I don't think that article proved what you were hoping it would.
Why do you think so many people are moving out of LA. New York,and Seattle?Cities like New York, LA, Chicago, Atlanta, and SEattle are the economic engines that prop up red state beggars.
Why do you think so many people are moving out of LA and Seattle?
People come and go for a lot of reasons. Maybe housing rates are too high is just one reason.
Sounds like a wage gap issue. HmPeople come and go for a lot of reasons. Maybe housing rates are too high is just one reason.
Only because of zoning laws. That way the rich libs get to keep the unclean away and their property values up. Then, when they retire and cash out, they move to a red state to get away from all the taxes and poverty.
That's another reason why we need to separate. Then when the failed right comes crawling back, they have to agree to live by civilized rules.
Correct but would you agree that still leaves 48ish percent thinking the opposite. That’s a pretty large portion of the countryHalf? I think the past few presidential elections, and the 2020 congressional elections show that the nation is more left leaning than right leaning.
Seems to me the biggest argument against the AR is the amount of damage that can be done quickly. So for kicks and giggles let's assume all guns were banned. Does anybody think this prevents mass murders? The internet can teach you how to build a bomb with items that can be found easier than buying a gun. One bomb placed in a grocery store kills a lot more than 10 people so then what? Pretty sure bombs are already illegal but that hasn't stopped people from using them. Point is, banning guns is purely a political argument used to get votes but in actuality, there is no cure for stopping someone intent on doing harm to others unless people recognize the sickness and do something about it.
Here's the thing. These gun grabbers don't want compromise. They say they will compromise, but they will just settled for what they can get now, and then ask for more compromise next year and the next year, until they get EVERYTHING they want. The only thing they see in a compromise is how little or how much they can take from you. They never give anything.
And I know all about the Civil War. It's where conservative traitors attempted to eliminate the United States because they wanted to keep owning black people.
No, it was Democrat traitors.
You're all right. Democrats were conservatives then.You need to learn some history so you don’t show your ignorance...democrats fought to keep their slaves...
Everyone was conservative back then....You're all right. Democrats were conservatives then.
I’m north of Atlanta about 25 milesI legally carry a weapon everywhere I am allowed to carry it for personal protection and the protection of people around me. I live in the City of Atlanta, GA which is a very high crime area. The criminals here have access to stolen weapons have have no problems shooting to steal your car or your iPhone, it happens every day here.
When I am at the grocery store or the gas station I never see any police. If someone started shooting people I would do my very best to stop them. I have advanced training in the tactical use of various firearms thanks to the USMC.
You will never get weapons away from criminals because they do not follow laws. I wish we could keep weapons away from crazy people but is it very hard to know who is crazy. The family of the shooter in CO knew he was crazy and the knew he had this weapon, they stated this in interviews with law enforcement.
Just imagine if one person in that store had a Glock and was ready to use it on the guy?
We have talked about moving north but we are leaving for MIA in a few years so we just have to suck-up living in this crime infested dysfunctional city for a few more years.I’m north of Atlanta about 25 miles
You have now proven yourself a credible idiot.
Good luck with your economic engine without food and water.Cities like New York, LA, Chicago, Atlanta, and SEattle are the economic engines that prop up red state beggars.
Lincoln was a Republican.
Good luck with your economic engine without food and water.
Well compared to today, certainly.Everyone was conservative back then....
Liberals Resurrect Myth That Blue States Subsidize Red States
The fiscally irresponsible point the finger at everyone else....bongino.com
I think the blue state vs red state debate is not as clear as some would like to think.
oh boy that’s some impressive mental gymnastics in that article. “It’s all the democrats in my state making us poor.”
Not what the article said at all. But what would a post of yours be without making crap up.
likewise it’s unsurprising you wouldn’t understand what you posted is actually saying.
If by "understand" you mean make crap up. What am I saying, of course you do.
No, he would still be against slavery...And all the Southerners were Democrats then.
Lincoln would have definitely been a Democrat in today’s society.
No, he would still be against slavery...