ADVERTISEMENT

Dawn being Dawn at ESPYs

You're not alone in being obtuse. Pepperdine University says the popular vote is, "The popular vote is simply the candidate that received the largest total number of votes from the American citizens that cast their vote."

So they don't even count the second place candidate's votes as part of the popular vote. See, you dullards will never walk alone

Dawn being Dawn at ESPYs

Damn, you are stupid. King of the straw man.

No one is saying or said anyone's votes don't count in the vote total. No one cares.

They winner of the popular vote is the person who received the most votes cast.

"Popular" vote has no meaning outside of who wins the most votes.

The total votes cast in an election is called the total vote count/total votes cast. They aren't called "the popular vote"
So I was correct. You don't grasp basic English? That's all you had to say. You're wrong, as usual, and I can live with that.

Dawn being Dawn at ESPYs

She lost the governor's race.

Walker is a moron. His own son didn't support him. His opponent was better in every way. They didn't want a damn fool representing them that can barely string a sentence together- and when he does, it's only partially related to English.
Walker was compromised in many ways, as was his opponent. But his opponent has shown how little he cares about individual liberty and constantly supports stances that are detrimental to society. They have two disgusting despots representing them now, because Trump is a threat to democracy or something. It's just too bad decent people have to suffer under the government that racist pigs like you deserve.

Dawn being Dawn at ESPYs

He mentioned who WON the popular vote.

He wasn't talking about how many total ballots were cast- which would be the vote total.

Lying moron
So he was wrong about the popular vote, too. I mean, he isn't as dumb as you, but he was wrong.

I realize we're at loggerheads over this. You think you're right, and I know I'm right, so in a way we both win.

If only you weren't such a repugnant liar with a poor intellect, there may be hope. But I guess that's where deploracrats come from.

Dawn being Dawn at ESPYs

The person who wins the popular vote is easy to determine by looking at who received the most votes.

You don't have to receive 50.1% of the total votes cast to win the "popular" vote.

you are a moron. You keep proving it.
So you're saying that the votes that Ralph Nader received in 2000 weren't part of the popular vote? Or the votes Gary Johnson received in 2016 weren't part of the popular vote?

Dawn being Dawn at ESPYs

Walker is a moron- with a train wreck of a personal life

and Lake is a fool- who attacks everyone and couldnt work with anyone.

Both deserved to lose- and did.
Lake hasn't lost this race yet.

Walker is kind of a moron. His terrorist opponent is an even bigger one, but cheap GOP voters and those that cut off their nose to spite their face to make some kind of point saw to it that Warnazi will have at least six years to foul the Senate nest.

Dawn being Dawn at ESPYs

Sneaky lying won't help you

No one was discussing the POPULAR VOTE in and of itself.

The discussion in post #1645 was "won the popular vote"

The winner of the popular vote is the person who has "the largest total number of votes from the people who cast their vote"

The candidate that WINS the popular vote for all candidates was Al Gore in 2000, and Hillary in 2016.
Ah, but you're an imbecile. GamecockStock brought up the popular vote. Again, since the popular vote is made up of ALL the votes cast, if a candidate doesn't surpass 50%, no one wins it. I know that most people don't see it that way, but just because 99 idiots tell me that 2 + 2 = 5, it doesn't mean the one person that tells me 2 + 2 = 4 is wrong.

All this is confirming is that you don't know the definition of basic terms.

Dawn being Dawn at ESPYs

Kari Lake, like Herschel Walker, was not the best GOP candidate for their particular Senate race. I mean, both would've been superior to their opponent, but reality says they were going to have a difficult time winning.

It also doesn't hurt deploracrats that fleeing Californians have ruined Arizona because they are too moronic to connect the dots between their voting habits and the cesspool their state has become.

Dawn being Dawn at ESPYs

I just understand words. Those that don't vote, can't be considered or counted as part of the vote. (Middle school students learn this)

noun
  1. an act of voting by the electorate of a country or area:
    • the choice expressed through the votes cast by the electorate:
I'll let a conservative university define it for you:

The popular vote is simply the candidate that received the largest total number of votes from the American citizens that cast their vote.
The popular vote is the total votes cast for all candidates, not just the top two vote getters. Since more people wanted someone else to be POTUS than they wanted Gore or HIllary to be POTUS, neither won the popular vote. As you are a person of very limited intelligence, I don't expect you to comprehend. I also don't expect you to care about minor party candidates. That's why your deviant party of hate has been trying to save democracy by forcibly removing them from ballots.

Dawn being Dawn at ESPYs

Also, several polls there suggested the Democrat Senate candidate is doing really well over Kari Lake. Apparently, she's too crazy even for them.
I was surprised to read how far ahead Gallego is over Lake. Maybe I should not be. When she ran For Governor two years ago. she asked if there were any McCain Republicans in the facility she was speaking at. Then she said , "Alright, get the hell out." Then she said, "Boy, Arizona has delivered some losers". Then, she lost the Governors race. She obviously never learned that politics is about addition, not subtraction.

Dawn being Dawn at ESPYs

The Hill web site has it Harris 49.2% Trump 44.8%
Real Clear Politics has it Harris 48.3% Trump 46.7%
538 web site has it Harris 47.1% Trump 43.7%.

All of them average multiple polls. The Hill averages 143 polls. I don't know how many the other two web sites average.

A couple of things I would keep in mind. The Electoral College is what determines the winner. Gore and H. Clinton both won the popular vote but, not the Electoral College. The other thing is that in both 2016 and 2020, in the final results, Trump's popular vote total was higher than the polls indicated it would be. So, polls are not predictive.
Neither Gore or Hillary won the popular vote.

Dawn being Dawn at ESPYs

The Hill web site has it Harris 49.2% Trump 44.8%
Real Clear Politics has it Harris 48.3% Trump 46.7%
538 web site has it Harris 47.1% Trump 43.7%.

All of them average multiple polls. The Hill averages 143 polls. I don't know how many the other two web sites average.

A couple of things I would keep in mind. The Electoral College is what determines the winner. Gore and Clinton both won the popular vote but, not the Electoral College. The other thing is that in both 2016 and 2020, in the final results, Trump's popular vote total was higher than the polls indicated it would be. So, polls are not predictive.

So, go pick 4 or 5 states and watch them, forgetting any other generic nationwide poll, right?
  • Like
Reactions: gamecock stock

Dawn being Dawn at ESPYs

Libs working on stealing another election.

Exclusive: Harris widens lead over Trump, Reuters/Ipsos poll finds

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/ha...hispanics-reutersipsos-poll-finds-2024-08-29/
The Hill web site has it Harris 49.2% Trump 44.8%
Real Clear Politics has it Harris 48.3% Trump 46.7%
538 web site has it Harris 47.1% Trump 43.7%.

All of them average multiple polls. The Hill averages 143 polls. I don't know how many the other two web sites average.

A couple of things I would keep in mind. The Electoral College is what determines the winner. Gore and H. Clinton both won the popular vote but, not the Electoral College. The other thing is that in both 2016 and 2020, in the final results, Trump's popular vote total was higher than the polls indicated it would be. So, polls are not predictive.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT