Any Concern with Burch Not Signing LOI Today?
- Thread starter Cocky4SC
- Start date
Hasn't said. I knew Boogie wasn't signing today, but having Burch not ink his name today is still uneasy.
Anybody seen any stats as to how often players flip after doing a big dog and pony show commitment? I know kids flip all the time, but I wonder if they do it less after a big public statement.
Josh Kendall reported tweeted that he wouldn't be signing today, and didn't field any questions. I take the kid at his word, but from past heartbreak being a USC fan, I could see him flipping to somewhere else....
Ummm, no. Burch has been the most respectful recruit I can ever remember. You really think he and his family would do anything to harm Muschamp?
I was under the impression that he was waiting on Muschamp to be there with him... Muschamp is late for his presser from what I understand
Muschamp can't comment on him until he signs, so having a joint presser without him signing sounds weird.
I say it’s a concern. If your done your done. Why do you not sign?
Only thing I can figure is that it is the same reason Huntley won't.
Yikes. Hope for the best, assume the worst. The Gamecock Creed.
Being a Gamecock fan has certainly molded us to be conditioned .... also, Bobby Cremins (the coach, not the player) ... after he was on WIS-TV being interviewed with Joe Dagett (I believe) and then we know what happened ... thus, I will feel better when he signs and I can live with folks attacking ... there is a reason there is a signing requirement and until then, anything could happen ... all in all, very surprised that Burch signed and Champ needed this in the worst way ... now, he needs to produce in the win column, no if's and's or but's ... letting Bobo run the offense should allow for player development, something that is seriously lacking on offense on any Champ coached team ... Merry Christmas, fellow Gamecock fans ... Luke 2:9-14
Muschamp and staff say they aren't worried about it at all. So I'm not worrying... It's a done deal..
I believe in his announcement he said something like he was a friend of Jackson...but a bigger friend of his father’s. (Sound wasn’t clear...so I could be wrong.)
I have no info.
That he didn’t take questions when he has been very private about this entire process makes perfect sense.
He seems to be consistent and that is a good thing.
That he didn’t take questions when he has been very private about this entire process makes perfect sense.
He seems to be consistent and that is a good thing.
Have no idea if this true but....saw it elsewhere that he is not an early enrollee.
That he and Huntley will sign together in Feb.
That he and Huntley will sign together in Feb.
There's only one reason you DON'T sign........ he ain't coming here dude. He's already in the back pocket of another program and this is just a stunt to screw us over in the end. Not that we need any help with that with Ray as AD.
Burch is an early enrollee. If he starts classes Jan 13, he's locked in for a year anyway, with no need to sign an NLI except for the hoopla.
Don't think Hammond allows for EEs.
Only one reason, huh? How confident are you in that one reason? Confident enough not to post here again if/when Burch signs with the Gamecocks?
I was just going by 247. A guy like that (super talent, good grades, etc.) should always be an early enrollee. Check out bylaw 14.3.1.1.2; it's a little confusing, but maybe with early academic certification and spring college enrollment, he could wrap up high school and enter college at the same time.
This certainly makes sense. Obvious that there can be more than one reason a recruit doesn't actually sign on signing day. Right ConKrete?
NCAA bylaws? 247 is where it was reported that Hammond's academic calendar didn't allow for EEs. I know some private schools do, but many do not.
Latest posts
-
-
-
-
It sickens me when I realize Muschamp ran our program so far into the ground it's going to take- Latest: Southern Fried Chicken
-