I agree with most of the sentiments here. The curve has been flattened. The narrative appears to have shifted to preventing any and all deaths from coronavirus. In an ideal world, that would be a noble goal. However, people die everyday from a host of theoretically preventable causes, whether its car accidents, infections, the flu, cancer, disease, homicide, workplace accidents, drugs and alcohol abuse, etc. An indefinite quarantine would theoretically prevent many of those deaths as well--but at the cost of our personal freedoms. Until now, Americans haven't been willing to make that compromise. Fear-mongering by the media has convinced the majority of the country that we are imminently preparing to confront our own mortality if we don't shelter in place forever. The numbers simply don't back that up. Make no mistake, the coronavirus CAN kill you, regardless of your age or current state of health. The world has changed because of that reality, and I accept that. Wearing a seat belt is annoying, but it is a mitigation strategy to at least make a necessary yet inherently dangerous activity safer. The same analogy applies to social distancing measures--life is a bit more dangerous than it was pre-COVID, and we may need to implement minor inconveniences to keep us as safe as possible without sacrificing our God-given freedoms. To put it plainly, I support reopening businesses, reopening churches, reopening schools, etc. to the extent possible while implementing appropriate mitigation strategies--whether that is limiting capacities, providing handwashing stations and hand sanitizer, offering PPE to employees who want it.