Clemson. Another Brent Venables special. Defense will confound Fields just like they did Tua. Offense will wear them down in 2nd half.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Clemson’s OL will be tested by OSU. That might be the difference. If the Buckeyes can get to Lawrence it could be interesting. Golden boy hasn’t been roughed up.On paper I'd say Clemzen. But you never know. One turnover can swing momentum to a team and sometimes the other team can't recover ala the National Championship last year. I'll never believe Clemzen was as much better than Bama last year as the score would indicate. If OSU can rock them early and get them a little rattled they could beat the taters. But short of that I think the taters take it. UGHH, think I just threw up in my mouth a little.
Clemson wins because the 2 teams haven't changed by 31 points in 2 years. Clemson has the better defense and has the experience winning these big games.
Clemson will win because the football gods hate me
Once again, I’m not sure that you can judge Clemson’s offensive line based on how they did in one game. Statistically, Clemson has the best offensive line in the country.I don’t agree with many of these posts. If there was one spot USC matched up with Clemson it was our D front vs. their O line. Ohio State is significantly better on D across the board. They have potentially #1-5 pick in the draft with their DE and CB. The DE is Clowney good. I think it’s a close game as long as they start fast (unlike the Wisconsin game). I don’t think experience matters here. It does at QB but Clemson has a lot of new faces on both sides of the ball.
I disagree. 2 Years is an eternity in College football. Look at what happened between Clemson and Alabama: 2017-2018: Alabama beat Clemson 24-6 in the first round. The next year, Clemson beat Alabama 44-16. That's one year.Clemson wins because the 2 teams haven't changed by 31 points in 2 years. Clemson has the better defense and has the experience winning these big games.
You can judge it by their competition though.... No one can say anything about their stat rankings, it's a moot point , their schedule automatically disqualifys their stat rankings.... There should be an asterisk beside it ...Once again, I’m not sure that you can judge Clemson’s offensive line based on how they did in one game. Statistically, Clemson has the best offensive line in the country.
Stop the presses. Was just watching espn (otherwise known as “tiger central”.Clemson wins bc we live in orange hell.
You can judge it by their competition though.... No one can say anything about their stat rankings, it's a moot point , their schedule automatically disqualifys their stat rankings.... There should be an asterisk beside it ...
I said they will be exposed. How do you really know anything based on the slate of opponents this year beyond "they're good"?[/QUOTE we shall see soon enough, i honestly hope im wrong.....but they are at least as good as they were last year....osu might keep it close, but it wouldnt surprise me if they lose by more than 21
I will agree, same schedule basically. You can't discount the fact that the whole 2018 D Line is in the NFL, the players that are on the roster now are not the caliber that they lost, and it's not close.I hear you, but didnt they play basically the same schedule last year? Maybe TAMU was a little better last year and it was on the road. NC State, GT and Syracuse were worse this year. BC and FSU were probably about the same. Louisville was certainly better this year and Wake too. UNC was an upgrade over last year. Virginia better than or equal to Pitt in last years ACC Championship game? Seems like a similar schedule, but Clemson's stats are better this year.
I dont know who is going to win, but it should be a great game. I say whoever jumps out early and/or wins the turnover margin. Feels like that kind of a close game.
I will agree, same schedule basically. You can't discount the fact that the whole 2018 D Line is in the NFL, the players that are on the roster now are not the caliber that they lost, and it's not close.
The back seven has played better. On the DL, Davis is almost as good as Wilkins and the DEs are comparable to Ferrell and Bryant. But we don't have 340 lb Dexter Lawrence plugging the middle. Don't know what BV is scheming to account for a mobile quarterback and a powerful runner, but expect it to be something of a surprise.
I dont know. Davis is great, and the DE's could eventually be as good as Ferrell and Bryant, but they are not yet, not right now.
I do think the defensive backfield might be the best as a unit that Dabo has ever had. Hence the best turnover margin Dabo has ever had.
That us what makes this game so interesting. Can Clemson's front contain Dobbins and Fields. Last years unit would have for sure. This years unit will have to rely more on coverage sacks/scrambles and well disguised/timed blitzes.
Everyone says Clemson has to stop Dobbins, but I wonder if Venables will give Dobbins his 150yards and contain Fields to 200ish passing and 50ish rushing instead. I dont think 400ish yards is enough to beat Clemson, even with OSU's defense.
Wow, that's weird ... I'd be more afraid of the best offense in the last 10 years of football..... Burrow is doing things that no one has done, and you're more worried about OSU.... It's fine, you won't see LSU anyways, you leave Saturday night as a loser.... That's how this story ends... Now please go back to your own board....It might be a shootout like the first two champ games we played with Alabama. Those came down to a few mistakes on each side. It should be fun unless one of the teams just has a bad day. I do worry about this team a lot more than LSU, but you never know in the post-season.
Wow, that's weird ... I'd be more afraid of the best offense in the last 10 years of football..... Burrow is doing things that no one has done, and you're more worried about OSU.... It's fine, you won't see LSU anyways, you leave Saturday night as a loser.... That's how this story ends... Now please go back to your own board....
Oh ok , so now we are going by the games and not stats? Ok, I've seen you guys play garbage all year, and Trevor looked below average most of the year, but keep sipping the Kool aid ......LSU has played teams with athletes not a bunch of ACC schools .... I've watched them, I'm shocked you can even watch a full Clemson game, the games are very boring.....LSU has a below average defense. We have more talent on offense than LSU and a good defense. You have to watch the games closer than just looking at the stats at the end. LSU is only number 1 because Georgia's coaching was totally incompetent.
LSU has a below average defense. We have more talent on offense than LSU and a good defense. You have to watch the games closer than just looking at the stats at the end. LSU is only number 1 because Georgia's coaching was totally incompetent.
Oh ok , so now we are going by the games and not stats? Ok, I've seen you guys play garbage all year, and Trevor looked below average most of the year, but keep sipping the Kool aid ......LSU has played teams with athletes not a bunch of ACC schools .... I've watched them, I'm shocked you can even watch a full Clemson game, the games are very boring.....
There is atleast some truth to this. There is a reason the committee put LSU #1, it was the best way to dodge criticism. Vegas would favor Clemson (and Ohio State) over LSU by 5-7 points and it would have looked really bad if #3 was favored by that much over #2. Make no mistake, that LSU offense can win it all, but that offense also only scored 23 against Auburn (good defense and bad offense) and 30 something against Georgia (good defense and even worse offense). I dont think LSU will score more than 35ish against either team, likely less. They have not faced a team with a good offense AND a good defense this year, Bama included.
That's the only chance they have of winning.If Ohio State can pressure Lawrence, then they can win.
Clemson
Ohio State didn't have Kevin Wilson as its OC back in '16. He knows how to neutralize Venables bc they were both on staff at OU and is very familiar with him. Fields is much more of an accurate passer than JT Barret ever was. Clemson and its fans are beyond arrogant and are going to be in for a rude awakening.
The back seven has played better. On the DL, Davis is almost as good as Wilkins and the DEs are comparable to Ferrell and Bryant. But we don't have 340 lb Dexter Lawrence plugging the middle. Don't know what BV is scheming to account for a mobile quarterback and a powerful runner, but expect it to be something of a surprise.
Clemson can't block Young... Makes it tough on Lawrence all game.. Lawrence throws 2 picks. Score Ohio St. 34.. Clemson 17.... Clemson makes the excuse that Scott leaving for South Florida caused them to lose... Bank on it.Clemson. Another Brent Venables special. Defense will confound Fields just like they did Tua. Offense will wear them down in 2nd half.
I would have said OSU in a blow out until they struggled against Wisconsin. Clemson hasn't faced anything close to OSU this year. Of course, I didn't think they had a chance against Bama those two years, either. Don't know who wins. I do think it will be close. If I had to bet money, I'd put in on OSU winning.
Clemson can't block Young... Makes it tough on Lawrence all game.. Lawrence throws 2 picks. Score Ohio St. 34.. Clemson 17.... Clemson makes the excuse that Scott leaving for South Florida caused them to lose... Bank on it.
Ohio State didn't have Kevin Wilson as its OC back in '16. He knows how to neutralize Venables bc they were both on staff at OU and is very familiar with him. Fields is much more of an accurate passer than JT Barret ever was. Clemson and its fans are beyond arrogant and are going to be in for a rude awakening.
Yeah, I'm not exactly the person to stroke Clemson's ego. I'll admit that.I can see OSU winning, but not a snowballs chance in hell Clemson score 17 points or less. This is not a Kelly Bryant lead offense.
You do realize Wisconsin would beat every team in the ACC by a minimum of 3 tds with exception of Clemson.
Nah. You need to watch them play. Wisconsin is a mirror image of Georgia, with better coaching and lesser talent if you go by recruit rankings. If you slow down the run, you can beat them. My feeing is that OSU isn’t quite as good as last year’s Alabama. Last year’s game should have been close, so I don’t know whether we win or lose.