I read your vapid screed. I never said there was such a track and it was not I who first mentioned the subject of tracks around any football field. That was you. And it was not I who introduced name-calling into the discussion, either. But when you mentioned "tracks", I referred to Ohio State, which had both lowered the field and removed a track to enhance the field area for football and to afford better viewing. Lowering the field is both doable and desirable, inasmuch as the bottom two or three rows of seats on three sides of our stadium provide worm's eye views of the action. There would be no loss of stadium floor area because I'm not talking about adding rows of seats at the bottom, but having the current bottom rows situated higher with relation to field level. I trust you can assimilate this.
I'm sure Ray will get right on this, with you insight provided all along the way.