On both of them. Two mental breakdowns on one play.He did....there were 2 LBs. If you've got 2, you pick the one who rushes. That was on Wonnum.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
On both of them. Two mental breakdowns on one play.He did....there were 2 LBs. If you've got 2, you pick the one who rushes. That was on Wonnum.
Sure? Was Harris supposed to block? Unless we know the play, we're guessing...but there's no guessing on the OT.On both of them. Two mental breakdowns on one play.
So to fix the Oline we need another QB???? Brilliant.We need a more mobile quarterback to expand the pocket and not just stand back there and get hammered. That would at least buy a little more time for plays to develop. Why are quick screen passes not being used more?
The same as for a lot of positions- TALENT.What do you guys see as the biggest issues with our "O Line" right now? From a coaching/technique standpoint.
If the DE's inside shoulder is passed or level to the tackle's outside shoulder he's beat. Unless the RB is running a flat route, he's supposed to chip with his inside shoulder to give the tackle time to recover. Then continue his route. That's the way I was taught. Maybe they use different blocking scheme. If so, I don't like it at all.Sure? Was Harris supposed to block? Unless we know the play, we're guessing...but there's no guessing on the OT.
There are only 5 and only 1 in the southeast (Florida).Offer every 5 * Ol in the country . Every one .
I said we need a mobile quarterback which we have in Doty. He is mobile and and a run threat which takes the pressure off the O line. I never said that would FIX the O line. How is your reading comprehension?So to fix the Oline we need another QB??
But there was no DE. They were both LBs.If the DE's inside shoulder is passed or level to the tackle's outside shoulder he's beat. Unless the RB is running a flat route, he's supposed to chip with his inside shoulder to give the tackle time to recover. Then continue his route. That's the way I was taught. Maybe they use different blocking scheme. If so, I don't like it at all.
....and apparently sub a LB for a DL and we go full brain fart.UGA D line will destroy us.
Pretty damn good. How's yours? The title of the thread is "O Line issues?" not QB issues.I said we need a mobile quarterback which we have in Doty. He is mobile and and a run threat which takes the pressure off the O line. I never said that would FIX the O line. How is your reading comprehension?
OK, so you think we should add a sixth defensive back to help the Dline?Exactly, and what I said was something to help with the O line issues. Do you not comprehend that that is what a more mobile quarterback can do such as Doty when he returns, avoid the rush? Are you purposely being obtuse?
I think that is where are problem is. We have teams coming up against us that don't respect our ability to throw the football. They're pretty much daring us to throw the football. It didn't help that Zeb was ice cold to start the game.They blocked better in the 4th quarter after we started completing some passes.
It doesn’t have to be a mobile QB it just has to be one that can complete a pass downfield or if the coaches call things to the outside. It’s all about stopping the defense from being comfortable enough to just drive 6+ guys to the backfield every time.Exactly, and what I said was something to help with the O line issues. Do you not comprehend that that is what a more mobile quarterback can do such as Doty when he returns, avoid the rush? Are you purposely being obtuse?
We don’t know what the protection call was on that play, or how they were coached to react in that situation. It looks like they are in 10 personnel, which they rarely run. The line appears to be sliding left in a zone protection concept. Both the RT and RG end up blocking no one.Sure? Was Harris supposed to block? Unless we know the play, we're guessing...but there's no guessing on the OT.
WowOK, so you think we should add a sixth defensive back to help the Dline?
And this formation never showed up on any film of ECU?Both the RT and RG end up blocking no one.
I think we’re agreeing. It’s not necessarily a personnel issue, but it’s certainly a coaching and preparation issue. Only the LT has really put in some bad shifts. The rest of the line looks solid from an individual technique and capabilities standpoint.And this formation never showed up on any film of ECU?
This is what's called getting "out-coached ".
I ordered a chicken and an egg from Amazon ……………I’l get back to you!!😎Maybe, but did they block better because we completed some passes or did we complete some passes because they blocked better?
Watch out for porch pirates. That's just the sort of thing they're looking for.I ordered a chicken and an egg from Amazon ……………I’l get back to you!!😎
What??? It's was a 4 man front.But there was no DE. They were both LBs.
It's a 3 man front with 2 LBs lined up over the right side. One LB rushes, the other drops into coverage.What??? It's was a 4 man front.
It's a 3 man front with 2 LBs lined up over the right side. One LB rushes, the other drops into coverage.
So much for the OL being overloaded with 7 man rushes....they rushed 4, we only touched 2 of them.
I get what you're saying.It's a 3 man front with 2 LBs lined up over the right side. One LB rushes, the other drops into coverage.
So much for the OL being overloaded with 7 man rushes....they rushed 4, we only touched 2 of them.
I gotta agree with you on this. It was a 4 man front - 2 DTs and 2 DE aligned on the LOS. The LB moved up to the line like he was blitzing then backed off into coverage. The RT read blitz and took a step toward the LB and the DE went around the outside. I think he did what he was taught to do, which is always take the guy to the inside first. A back has to take the other guy. Obviously, he can't block 2 guys so when they read inside blitz the T has to take that guy and the back take the outside guy. Instead the back released up field on a route leaving the QB exposed.What??? It's was a 4 man front.
No it is not.I gotta agree with you on this. It was a 4 man front - 2 DTs and 2 DE aligned on the LOS.
I get what you're saying.No it is not.
It is a 3 man front offset. There is only one DE with two DTs. #96 lines up in front of the center like a NG, then stunts around our left end. Both the RG & RT are left to block the LBs. One of the LBs lines up outside the RT's shoulder, which should be the guy he picks. Instead, neither the RG or RT block anyone until the RG helps with a double team.
Sounds more and more like they they didn't practice for ECU that week. Georgia gets to keep watching film of 2 plays over and over.According to Marcus(in the article post on GC) we only ran 2 running plays against EIU. Over and over. We played somewhat similar last week. It sounds like we need Luke back to really open up the offense. Guess we shall find out soon enough.
It's a 4 man front. It don't make a damn where the DTs line up. There's 4 guys on the line of scrimmage. This is little league, 2 guys on the inside are DTs two guy on the outside are DEs.No it is not.
It is a 3 man front offset. There is only one DE with two DTs. #96 lines up in front of the center like a NG, then stunts around our left end. Both the RG & RT are left to block the LBs. One of the LBs lines up outside the RT's shoulder, which should be the guy he picks. Instead, neither the RG or RT block anyone until the RG helps with a double team.
If you want to count the 2 LBs and the CB....it's a 6 man front. But there's only one DE on that line.It's a 4 man front. It don't make a damn where the DTs line up. There's 4 guys on the line of scrimmage. This is little league, 2 guys on the inside are DTs two guy on the outside are DEs.
That’s not necessarily true. Rarely as an OL if a team is showing multiple blitzers do you focus on the outside guy and leave the middle blitzer alone. This is especially true if you have a RB in the backfield who is probably supposed to recognize it’s coming and make the adjustment.No it is not.
It is a 3 man front offset. There is only one DE with two DTs. #96 lines up in front of the center like a NG, then stunts around our left end. Both the RG & RT are left to block the LBs. One of the LBs lines up outside the RT's shoulder, which should be the guy he picks. Instead, neither the RG or RT block anyone until the RG helps with a double team.
The middle "blitzer" was lined across from the RG. That was his guy, but the LB dropped back into coverage.Rarely as an OL if a team is showing multiple blitzers do you focus on the outside guy and leave the middle blitzer alone.
The position is determined by the ALIGNMENT. The stance is irrelevant. Many DEs play from a 2 point stance. On the play in question there are 4 men ALIGNED on the LOS. The guy next to the LT is ON THE LOS. By definition he is a DE on that play. The LB who sneaks up close to the LOS is still behind the line. He is a LB. The roster nor the stance determines the position. The same is true on both sides of the ball. A WR who is lined up on the LOS is a Split End. A WR who is lined up behind the LOS is a Flanker(or slot if inside the SE). Those are by definition the positions as determined by the alignment.If you want to count the 2 LBs and the CB....it's a 6 man front. But there's only one DE on that line.
How many got their hands in the dirt?