Hint. They are not in SC. Not just because of sunshine. Factor in Syracuse and this weeks not ranked schedule close game. Both at home.
hint #2. Ad an E to not in SC
hint #2. Ad an E to not in SC
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not true - they will keep the #1 ranking.Hint. They are not in SC. Not just because of sunshine. Factor in Syracuse and this weeks not ranked schedule close game. Both at home.
hint #2. Ad an E to not in SC
BS... they will drop to at least #3.Not true - they will keep the #1 ranking.
No they won’t, they didn’t have their starting qb and 4 defensive starters. They will still be #1Not true - they will keep the #1 ranking.
They beat a Nebraska team that’s worse than us and a PSU team that is as historically overrated as Notre Dame. Imo, no.Ohio St. will be named #1.
IMO,all the more to stay at no1.No they won’t, they didn’t have their starting qb and 4 defensive starters. They will still be #1
ALABAMA WILL BEOhio St. will be named #1.
Really have to ask ??? They play in the ACC and struggled terribly against BC who got killed by Virginia TechWhat exactly warrants moving Clemson. Starting qp out, 4 out on defense, and still beat a decent Boston college team. I don’t see anything that warrants moving them from #1. If they beat ND next week they should and would defiantly be #1. Top 5 win on the rd with a backup qb.
What exactly warrants moving Clemson. Starting qp out, 4 out on defense, and still beat a decent Boston college team. I don’t see anything that warrants moving them from #1. If they beat ND next week they should and would defiantly be #1. Top 5 win on the rd with a backup qb.
You can tote that ESPN bullshit narrative all you want, the acc is not as bad as everyone makes them out to be.Really have to ask ??? They play in the ACC and struggled terribly against BC who got killed by Virginia Tech
They played blah against a terrible Syracuse team
Yes taters are good but come on. ACC is just horrible. It’s why they get a free pass yearly with that schedule
I mean Georgia and BaMa and heck many SEC teams would also cruise to playoffs with an ACC schedule
It’s reality and taters know it
It won't be UofSC, is that what you're saying?
What exactly warrants moving Clemson. Starting qp out, 4 out on defense, and still beat a decent Boston college team. I don’t see anything that warrants moving them from #1. If they beat ND next week they should and would defiantly be #1. Top 5 win on the rd with a backup qb.
You can tote that ESPN bullshit narrative all you want, the acc is not as bad as everyone makes them out to be.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
The ACC sucks.
We've said that for the past few years outside of LSU and the taters have beaten both in their most recent head to head, don't be shocked if they win it again this year. They do this every year then play like maniacs in the big games, sucks but it ain't changing so long as they keep recruiting at the levels they are.Bama and Ohio State are clearly the two best teams right now
Hey, look on the bright side... it takes away one of Dabo's motivational techniques prior to the ND game... "
No one respects us" etc.
If they'd have been knocked down to #2 or #3, you can bet he would be preaching "Let's show them. Leave no doubt" etc. all week.
I disagree. They dont have the horses they normally do. They will not keep up with Bama or even Ohio State this year.We've said that for the past few years outside of LSU and the taters have beaten both in their most recent head to head, don't be shocked if they win it again this year. They do this every year then play like maniacs in the big games, sucks but it ain't changing so long as they keep recruiting at the levels they are.
I wasn't trying to rationalize OSU as #1, I'm more referencing history, and the sports world's love and lust for OSU. So. Cal. and ND are the same way (or have been in the past).They beat a Nebraska team that’s worse than us and a PSU team that is as historically overrated as Notre Dame. Imo, no.
I'll say again... the intent by the ACC of adding the one OOC game was to schedule games with the SEC. It was the SEC that didn't want to play OOC games....while the ACC plays their weak assed schedule PLUS the weak, stat padding, non-conference teams....
I'll say again... the intent by the ACC of adding the one OOC game was to schedule games with the SEC. It was the SEC that didn't want to play OOC games.