ElectricalCock89 said:

Hoping we light up the scoreboard some. I have a feeling we may struggle the entire first half.

Defense should do very well, I expect ODU QB to have some wheels and give our guys a little trouble, but our LBS should handle it well.

Click to expand...

Lurker123 said:

Expect a sloppy game if only because it's the first game if the year.

We can wear them out in the second half with massive talent difference.

Click to expand...

DeeDave said:

Ahh, you are just lying again. But of course, you are a liar.

I am not aware of these "free abortions." Sounds interesting.

The Republican politicians that have paid for abortions for their mistresses, probably are interested in these free abortions. Especially since federal law prohibits such a thing.

You are a hypocrite, like they are.

Will the ‘Pro-Life’ GOP Rep Who Paid for an Abortion Ever Tweet Again?

Rep. Scott DesJarlais, who claims to be "100 percent" anti-abortion even after his ex-wife had two abortions and he pressured his mistress to have one, has been silent for a week.

www.thedailybeast.com

Pro-Life Pennsylvania Congressman Resigns Amid Reports He Asked Mistress to Get Abortion

Republican Congressman Tim Murphy of Pennsylvania has submitted a letter of resignation — amid tawdry revelations of an extramarital affair.

www.nbcphiladelphia.com

North Carolina Lt. Gov. Mark Robinson says he paid for abortion in 1989

North Carolina Lt. Gov. Mark Robinson, an outspoken conservative who campaigned on an anti-abortion platform, says he paid for an abortion in 1989.

www.wcnc.com

Click to expand...

DeeDave said:

Everyone is a bit inconsistent. But I see a larger role for the federal government than most any conservative

and even I don't want the federal government paying billions for IVF treatments. That's not even logical.

and no real conservative would ever dream of such a role for the federal government (or even state government). Talk about being inconsistent... Wow

"Republican lawmakers have historically opposed federal funding to cover health care, including by repeatedly attempting to undo the Obama-era Affordable Care Act, and may be unlikely to support similar plans, including for IVF."

Republican Rep. Michelle Steel of California faced criticism for supporting a GOP bill aiming to grant constitutional protection to embryos at “the moment of fertilization” after she publicly shared her own experience with IVF. Steel rescinded her co-sponsorship of the measure in March, two days after winning her primary, declaring she does not support federal restrictions on IVF.

In a statement to the AP, she said Congress “must pass policies to support and expand access to IVF treatments.”

Such flip-flopping from Republicans only provides fodder

Click to expand...

DeeDave said:

Nope

I just don't consider the federal government paying billions to make IVF procedures free to be a good idea, or a position a conservative promotes.

You obviously do think it's a good idea for the government to be involved and to pay for it. Seems antithetical to "conservative" ideals though on every level.

But I doubt anyone expects you to be remotely consistent.

Click to expand...

uscwatson21 said:

You think it's better to just let Russia take over the Ukraine?

Click to expand...

DeeDave said:

Yes. Nothing new with that. I am unaware of the conservative position being that the federal government should pay for the very expensive treatments. Doesn't seem to make any sense. It's already angered Trump supporters like Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council, a group opposed to IVF.




Yes, I wholeheartedly support such products in bathrooms in schools, especially in schools with young people who have trouble affording them because it's a basic quality of life issue just like I want toilet paper in bathrooms. It's also very popular.

I want people to have as many children as they choose. I do not think it's the federal government's role to pay for them to have expensive fertility treatments.




Yes, I want anyone in our country to be able to access medical treatment when it's needed to save their lives. I can't imagine there are more than 1-2% of people that do not want people to be able to access needed medical treatment.

No, I do not think it's the federal government's role to pay for expensive fertility treatments for anyone who wants them.

Only an idiot would disagree with my position.

Click to expand...