Oops. Completely agree with you on that....he was totally out of his element and it was sadly obvious..For clarification, I was referring to Caslen. Not Tanner -- this time. 😉
Oops. Completely agree with you on that....he was totally out of his element and it was sadly obvious..For clarification, I was referring to Caslen. Not Tanner -- this time. 😉
Lol. I was thinking that was definitely a subject where we agreed! 🤣Oops. Completely agree with you on that....he was totally out of his element and it was sadly obvious.
DefinitelyLol. I was thinking that was definitely a subject where we agreed! 🤣
BREAKING: Tom Crean’s firing could be imminent Sources have told me that Crean failed to report a recent physical altercation between assistants. University officials are now looking into firing him for causeLook what happens when don't foul every two seconds. But honestly how does Tom Crean still have job?
So I’m curious on your thoughts on this. It was my belief that Martin was not going to be fired before April 1, but obviously this happened today. What changed to decide to speed up the process a couple of weeks and eat a couple of hundred thousand?He won't be fired before April 1st. That's when his buyout drops to $3M (regardless of years remaining) under his renegotiated contract. That's a reduction from what it was.
Got approval from the BOT for the buyout.So I’m curious on your thoughts on this. It was my belief that Martin was not going to be fired before April 1, but obviously this happened today. What changed to decide to speed up the process a couple of weeks and eat a couple of hundred thousand?
But the buyout money comes from donors correct? How does the BOT control that? I know last year the BOT stopped it, but that was because of race more than anything.Got approval from the BOT for the buyout.
Don't know if this buyout is from donors (my clients weren't called). The BOT refused to approve the buyout last year because some representatives in the state legislature were making hay of it during the University's request for funding for the medical school. To my knowledge it had absolutely nothing to do with race....simply funding of University projects.But the buyout money comes from donors correct? How does the BOT control that? I know last year the BOT stopped it, but that was because of race more than anything.
The funding was the leverage. The power to control that money was basically blackmailing the school. The representatives involved tried to muddy the waters and bring the race card into this. It's what politicians do. I'll bet the title to my property that race will be brought up before we hire someone if the person isn't a minority. Personally I think we need to hire BJ or Mike for several reasons and race is one of them. There's nothing wrong with saying that either. I just really believe some old white guy isn't the answer for us right now. Btw, I'm an old white guy. Not hating on us, just thinking out loud what I think it will take to become a winner.Don't know if this buyout is from donors (my clients weren't called). The BOT refused to approve the buyout last year because some representatives in the state legislature were making hay of it during the University's request for funding for the medical school. To my knowledge it had absolutely nothing to do with race....simply funding of University projects.