Not me. Nothing wrong with wanting America to be the best. I try and be my best everyday. I expect the same from my country. That is why so many others want to come here - for education or other reasons.
New ICE rule will ‘devastate’ USC, global students, and hurt economy, experts say
- Thread starter Rollerdude123
- Start date
I think the opposite about #2.
If congress wants this to happen, they should say so.
In this case, it’s the executive branch making the decision from the “administrative state” which conservatives absolutely hate and rail against except - when they do it themselves. Heck, Kavenaugh talked about this very thing in his confirmation hearing- that he did not like this was one reasons he was nominated. Now the executive branch is just changing the rule themselves.
Trump didn’t make that rule or sign an executive order for it. Congress enacted it years ago. I would expect if you are an attorney that you would know such.
They didn’t change anything. Just made people AWARE of the EXISTING rule. Could Trump issue an Executive Order relaxing the rule in light of the pandemic? I assume he could. But, they didn’t add the rule. It has been a rule for years,
I agree. I should have explained myself better. Just because someone believes in America First, it doesn't mean they believe in America Only.
They are publishing a temporary final rule in the federal register without input from Congress. That’s exactly what conservatives have railed against for years calling it the “administrative state.”
if they aren’t changing anything, there would be no need to publish it in the federal register.
administrators at ICE changed their policy and are publishing it as a temporary rule.
It’s certainly amazing how conservatives did a 180 on executive orders once Trump took office.
It's damned well about time you did......
If nothing else, maybe this will open some room for more South Carolina kids to be able to attend the university. And others like it. Very competitive to get into ones own state university this day and time as all of them seem to see just how many out of state, and foreign, students they can get in school in the money grab for their higher tuition rates. And as a country, we educate the foreigners for that cash at the expense of our own. Sometimes even our enemies. Then they take the education we provide and go back home without any benefit of our tax dollar supported education benefitting us.
What sort of visa do they have? Can they just get a job and take the semester off? Subordinate work in your field of study wouldn’t be a bad idea.
Quite a few people rightfully getting fired for this stuff recently
Woman fired for yelling 'white lives are better' at Black Lives Matter protesters
“White lives are better, white lives matter,” she continued as she raised her hands in the air.
“She started screaming everything that she did and telling me that, I’m just a poor little black girl with a messed up mind that, we should have been kept as slaves and all these things.“
Moments after, a white man was also captured saying alongside Holt, “We should’ve kept you [expletive] slaves, that’s what we should’ve done.”
https://apple.news/Ag4TlcJSTT1awL2ZXyefTdA
Woman fired for yelling 'white lives are better' at Black Lives Matter protesters
“White lives are better, white lives matter,” she continued as she raised her hands in the air.
“She started screaming everything that she did and telling me that, I’m just a poor little black girl with a messed up mind that, we should have been kept as slaves and all these things.“
Moments after, a white man was also captured saying alongside Holt, “We should’ve kept you [expletive] slaves, that’s what we should’ve done.”
https://apple.news/Ag4TlcJSTT1awL2ZXyefTdA
Why in the world would these students want to attend school in such a racist place as America? It hates them, according to you RollerDude. So that means that high percentages of the student body hates them too. I wouldnt want to have to deal with a bunch of racists and bigots. I would prefer to go home.
this is the EXACT wrong way to look at things from my perspective.
1). It Likely won’t open up more room for South Carolina kids. public universities Thrive by having a large group of students from various states and countries. Money is a big part of it, but many incoming students seek out universities because they have wide demographic diversity. It’s a benefit to the school.
2). Many international students are highly sought after because of academic achievement and many have an interest in science, engineering, and math. That benefits the school in many ways, including In obtaining lucrative competitive grants, as well as partaking in research that the school can benefit from.
3) hundreds of thousands of American students study overseas each semester. Why we want to risk American students being denied those opportunities for political, retaliation purposes Is really stupid.
4) schools benefit greatly from the money of out of state and International students. South Carolina citizens have proven many times that we don’t value using tax money for higher education. So unless a school just dwindles and dies, they have to seek out that money from those willing to pay a higher price for it. Out of state and international students are willing to pay that price.
Last edited:
Why in the world would these students want to attend school in such a racist place as America? It hates them, according to you RollerDude. So that means that high percentages of the student body hates them too. I wouldnt want to have to deal with a bunch of racists and bigots. I would prefer to go home.
A university community, especially USC, is much more liberal than South Carolina as a whole. As a result, I doubt many international students feel like the university hates them because of racism since that same university works hard to seek them out. There are many campus organizations that seek to work with international students in a variety of ways. One step on USC’s campus quickly reveals it’s not nearly as conservative as South Carolina.
but with needless moves like this, I’m sure many have good reason to think the trump Administration does.
If they went home how would time zone differences “deteriorate their quality of life”? Not our problem.
Lack of quality internet at home? Not our problem.
Returning to unsafe situations? Again, not our problem.
Sound harsh? Not really. If students aren’t allowed on campus and they have to do online learning, what difference does it make if the student is from Australia, New Jersey, or France?
We have elementary, middle, high school, and college kids here who don’t have quality internet at home. Why are we worried about quality internet in a different country? They’d have to figure it out, just like our kids do.
Unsafe conditions in a different country? We have kids and young adults here living in unsafe conditions. Who do we prioritize?
Online class is online class, doesn’t matter if you’re doing your work at home in Texas, in a Starbucks in Pittsburgh, or an Internet cafe in Melbourne.
Nah, its another attempt to inject your political ramblings.
I see. What specific questions do you have that need answering?? Perhaps I can help.
Are we more concerned about public health or the economy?I see. What specific questions do you have that need answering?? Perhaps I can help.
Even more interesting. My perception is that the closing of the economy was directly relative to the "name of public health", and therefore NOT mutually exclusive to one another. Please explain.....
Nah, it’s shedding light on a major breaking news story that directly impacts my alma mater and my sophomore student. Non-sports topics that impact USC are discussed here all the time and have been for over a decade. Nothing new about it.
Hmm. Those are not relationships. The resulting events are effects of the same causation. Which is obviously relative to each other.
The effect of "commerce down" is the result of the causation of closing the economy.
The effect of "health up" is also the result of the causation of closing the economy.
The relationship that ties both results to closing the economy, therefore ties the effect of "in the name of public health" with "closing the economy". That effects of a cause may be inverse to each other, does not by that fact remove the relationship of the cause to either effect.
What do you think?
