I'm surprised he didn't lose more players who wanted to play for competent coaches.
And this is where your argument once again falls apart.
I'm surprised he didn't lose more players who wanted to play for competent coaches.
And this is where your argument once again falls apart.
Your entire argument relies on the assumption that Beamer is a competent coach who had unfortunate circumstances. Your argument falls apart quite quickly when faced with any scrutiny.
Funny thing is I remember when we joined the SEC and how all that money was gonna put us light years ahead of Clemson. lol.Right now the option is stop whining and accept your situation for what it is. We're an ACC team serving as bait for teams who have traditionally been superior and recently also got a big boost for further divide from the plebs via a screwy system.
He's two wins from our best start ever to spite the NIL. You really need a reboot Watson. Save this rhetorical chatter for later. Maybe it then will be more applicable.
Funny thing is I remember when we joined the SEC and how all that money was gonna put us light years ahead of Clemson. lol.
I applaud the troll job to stick with this argument even though you know you're really saying, "he's two wins worse than Muschamp.
So the coach with the most wins ever after 3 seasons (Muschamp) was still a bum? His issue was Year 4 and 5.
You and sideways laugh Lurker need to find a new team based on that brain dead logic.
His issue was year 4 or 5? No, he issue was he couldn't hire assistant coaches.
Ultimately, you are what you are as a coach. You keep making excuses for them. Do you think Beamer is a better coach than Muschamp?
Have no idea what you're talking. You've moving into the delusional zone. He was the winningest coach of all time after 3 seasons regardless of how he got there.
Do you remember how many ups and downs Spurrier had until Season 6? Winning ugly was a big part of the equation at USC and he talked about it all the time.
Was he a good coach? Or does this stat not reflect his actual tenure as coach.
Spurrier was a proven head coach and was worth the time. Do you think Muschamp would have been as good as Spurrier if given another 3-4 years?
The guy just loves to troll. His material rarely changes much at all. He ropes people in and spins the conversation in circles to his delight.I'm not sure what you're even arguing for at this point? It doesn't make sense.
You and I both know they aren't going to fire Beamer in the near future based on over 100 years of history.
I've stated many times that I'm totally neutral and will just let reality play out.
What's the point you are trying to get across at this juncture?
You and I both know they aren't going to fire Beamer in the near future based on over 100 years of history. '
The guy just loves to troll. His material rarely changes much at all. He ropes people in and spins the conversation in circles to his delight.
Then you're not doing a very good job. Your current convo with Ward had nothing to do with whether Beamer should be fired this season based on any performance. That's your spin cycle.I never spin the conversation. I always point out what you guys are actually arguing then you realize how dumb it sounds and then don't want to own it.
Then you're not doing a very good job. Your current convo with Ward had nothing to do with whether Beamer should be fired this season based on any performance. That's your spin cycle.
Please ahow me. I see him arguing that Beamer isn't going anywhere because there is no cause for the AD to do a thing based on performance and history.Our entire conversation is whether or not Beamer is a good coach and deserves more time...
Please ahow me. I see him arguing that Beamer isn't going anywhere because there is no cause for the AD to do a thing based on performance and history.
Except nothing shows this to be true.Beamer is an upgrade from the previous version
Ability is subjective. Performance is not. I think this is where I exit. Best of luck finding a new dance partner.Are you legitimately trying to split hairs between ability and performance?
Are you saying that Ward agrees that Beamer lacks the ability to be a good coach?
Ability is subjective. Performance is not. I think this is where I exit. Best of luck finding a new dance partner.
He has less wins in his first 3 years. I guess I don't know the meaning of the word upgrade. Unless we really aren't serious about winning.Beamer is an upgrade from the previous version but he’s fighting an uphill battle against the more powerful football programs in the league.
Because you've walked yourself into a corner where you're trying to argue the quality in performance between 5-7/6-6 isn't subjective...