ADVERTISEMENT

The Ban

Kennedy's family was in a Politico article in 2019 stating they didn't agree with him on vaccines and the pharma-sponsored MSM ran with it. Wonder how they feel about that position today?

Otherwise, he posts regularly about being with them at various family events. Take the blinders off.
I think I'll go with the individual who has been involved in some of the biggest wins against Pharma for decades as opposed to the opinion of a couple of women who have been holed up in Martha's Vineyard for years on end.
 
"Over the past several years, Tony Bobulinski has seemingly shared his story with anyone who would listen, including the Trump campaign. But his loftiest claims — that Joe Biden was deeply involved in his son’s overseas business deals — are still uncorroborated and have been undercut by other key witnesses."

Bobulinski went public in the final weeks of the 2020 race. When the Wall Street Journal covered Bobulinski’s public remarks, its story made clear that the China deal never closed, and that corporate records “show no role for Joe Biden.”

Another witness called by House Republicans, Rob Walker, said in January he did not believe Bobulinski was a credible actor and would never consider working with him again. Walker framed Bobulinski’s allegations as “dumbfounded” and “nonsensical.” He speculated that Bobulinski’s motivations were “political.”

“I think he had come to realize that Hunter had moved on without him and he was probably a little pissed also,” Walker added, “So that probably added a little fuel to Tony’s fire.”


As I have said - and even other Republicans have said- if they had the evidence, they'd vote and forward a report for prosecution. They haven't done that- and it looks unlikely they will.

Bobulinksi is the one that claimed Biden was on the phone while Biden was lying that he never had ANYTHING to do with ANY of Hunter's business partners. Meanwhile, Devon Archer is in jail for fraud.

Turns out Bobulinski was tell the truth and it was the Bidens that we lying. THAT is FACT.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cockofdawn
He was selling what all political actors always sell- the allure of access- even if they can't deliver it.

If that was against the law, 80% of politicians and their families would be in jail.

So now you are at "everyone does it". BS. And he did deliver access. Right on the speakerphone in the meetings. THAT IS FACT. He admitted that.

Crackhead Hunter with no experience in natural gas is hired on the board of Burisma for millions and as part of the deal to get billions in US aid, the prosecutor looking into Burisma is fired.

You are an absolute fool if you think the two didn't have anything to do with each other.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cockofdawn
The State of Tennessee has just banned chemicals from being sprayed in their skies. Other States to allow.

The law bans “intentional injection, release or dispersion, by any means of chemicals, chemical compounds, substances or apparatus within the border of the State, that has the express purpose of affecting temperature, weather or intensity of the Sunlight.”

Nothing better for human health than a constant blanket of chemicals in our air from Gates.

Yet another "conspiracy theory" turns out to be true. Who are the misinformation specialists?
 
In mean, you literally have their emails breaking down the money with 10% to the "big guy".

How utterly stupid do you have to be to say "there is no evidence"? About the only thing you don't have is a personal check from Xi being deposited directly into Biden's account.
 
In mean, you literally have their emails breaking down the money with 10% to the "big guy".

How utterly stupid do you have to be to say "there is no evidence"? About the only thing you don't have is a personal check from Xi being deposited directly into Biden's account.

Dave doesn't like evidence. He needs proof from the same people accused of mischief. It doesn't matter to him that the damage is typically done once proof finally arrives.

Meanwhile, our entire legal system is based on providing evidence that contradicts whatever proof the prosecution is claiming occurred.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cockofdawn
It IS a reason not to do it. we are talking about the federal government banning Americans, in a free country, from being able to access something 175 million Americans routinely use.
We are not talking about that at all. The proposals aren't to eliminate TikTok, they are to end Chinese ownership of it. Basically to seize it, then sell it off to verified American bidders.

I would not support a ban either, nor would I think the US courts would allow it.
 
Bobulinksi is the one that claimed Biden was on the phone while Biden was lying that he never had ANYTHING to do with ANY of Hunter's business partners. Meanwhile, Devon Archer is in jail for fraud.

Turns out Bobulinski was tell the truth and it was the Bidens that we lying. THAT is FACT.

LOL

"records reviewed (and provided by Bobulinksi) by The Wall Street Journal show no role for Joe Biden"

 
So now you are at "everyone does it". BS. And he did deliver access. Right on the speakerphone in the meetings. THAT IS FACT. He admitted that.

Crackhead Hunter with no experience in natural gas is hired on the board of Burisma for millions and as part of the deal to get billions in US aid, the prosecutor looking into Burisma is fired.

You are an absolute fool if you think the two didn't have anything to do with each other.


1) Congress is full of politicians that landed sweetheart jobs for their spouses, children, nephews, etc- often in industries that Congress is passing legislation about. Everyone does it isn't a defense, it's reality. I see no reason to single out one person you don't like- someone not even in government- for persecution when you ignore everyone else.

2) It's not illegal to hire someone with no experience because they are related to or know someone else. Again, this is about as common as it gets in Washington, Columbia, and everywhere else.

3)

A) As has been said 10000 times, Republican Senators were ALSO urging the Obama administration to pressure Ukraine to fire the Ukrainian prosecutor. Republican Sens. Rob Portman, Mark Kirk and Ron Johnson signed a letter in February 2016 urging the Obama administration to do just that. The letter was posted on the website of Republican Sen. Rob Portman.

B) John E. Herbst, the former Ambassador to Ukraine in the Bush administration testified in March 2016 to Congress that there was widespread support for the removal of the Ukrainian prosecutor Viktor Sholkin and offered praise for the Obama administration and Republican and Democrat Senators who were calling for his removal.

c) Alina Romanowski, who was nominated by Donald Trump to be ambassador to Kuwait testified in Congress and stated Ukraine did the right thing and "replaced a Prosecutor-General widely seen as corrupt.”


Arguing about this doesn't change anything. If Republicans had the evidence to impeach, they could can impeach without any Democrat votes.

But they don't have the evidence to impeach. That's why that haven't held a vote.
 
LOL

"records reviewed (and provided by Bobulinksi) by The Wall Street Journal show no role for Joe Biden"


Like I said, you literally have the emails breaking down who was getting how much. 10% for the big guy.

And the texts complaining that he had to give daddy half his scam money.

Hunter-Biden-Text.jpg
Only a blind fool can't or won't see what was going on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cockofdawn
In mean, you literally have their emails breaking down the money with 10% to the "big guy".

How utterly stupid do you have to be to say "there is no evidence"? About the only thing you don't have is a personal check from Xi being deposited directly into Biden's account.

emails that say "big guy" aren't evidence Joe Biden did something illegal.

First, Joe Biden, like anyone else, was more than welcome to earn money while he was not in elected office.

Second, I can write an email saying the former CEO of my company was helping me out by cheating on my taxes. That doesn't mean he did it. Maybe I was trying to impress someone else. Maybe I was lying to show the CEO supported me when he didn't. But, that's not evidence. Even a high schooler knows this.

Evidence is records showing "the big guy" actually got money for favors while he was in elected office and proving that money was for something illegal.

If Republicans had that evidence, we'd have seen it long ago after years of investigation.

You are substituting what you want to be true with reality. No serious person takes that seriously.
 
1) Congress is full of politicians that landed sweetheart jobs for their spouses, children, nephews, etc- often in industries that Congress is passing legislation about. Everyone does it isn't a defense, it's reality. I see no reason to single out one person you don't like- someone not even in government- for persecution when you ignore everyone else.

2) It's not illegal to hire someone with no experience because they are related to or know someone else. Again, this is about as common as it gets in Washington, Columbia, and everywhere else.

3)

A) As has been said 10000 times, Republican Senators were ALSO urging the Obama administration to pressure Ukraine to fire the Ukrainian prosecutor. Republican Sens. Rob Portman, Mark Kirk and Ron Johnson signed a letter in February 2016 urging the Obama administration to do just that. The letter was posted on the website of Republican Sen. Rob Portman.

B) John E. Herbst, the former Ambassador to Ukraine in the Bush administration testified in March 2016 to Congress that there was widespread support for the removal of the Ukrainian prosecutor Viktor Sholkin and offered praise for the Obama administration and Republican and Democrat Senators who were calling for his removal.

c) Alina Romanowski, who was nominated by Donald Trump to be ambassador to Kuwait testified in Congress and stated Ukraine did the right thing and "replaced a Prosecutor-General widely seen as corrupt.”


Arguing about this doesn't change anything. If Republicans had the evidence to impeach, they could can impeach without any Democrat votes.

But they don't have the evidence to impeach. That's why that haven't held a vote.

BS. But you got the lying talking points down like a good commie always does.

Biden did that on his own at the last minute. Obama Admin approved of Shokin.

https://nypost.com/2023/08/23/team-obama-loved-victor-shokin-why-did-biden-get-him-fired/

And again, Hunter had ZERO business being on that board. Not experience in Ukraine and not experience in the natural gas industry. Quid Pro Joe, without a doubt, to anybody with even an ounce of common sense.
 
We are not talking about that at all. The proposals aren't to eliminate TikTok, they are to end Chinese ownership of it. Basically to seize it, then sell it off to verified American bidders.

I would not support a ban either, nor would I think the US courts would allow it.

It's the same damn thing.

The legislation bans and eliminates TikTok from use by Americans if the company doesn't sell it.

if someone did that to you, you'd call that blackmail.

I don't think the government's role is to ban Americans from using social media apps the marketplace has- made popular because they don't like it.

Pass a damn meaningful data privacy bill that applies to everyone equally instead of "seizing" companies the government doesn't like and banning it from use by Americans if the company doesn't sell out.
 
BS. But you got the lying talking points down like a good commie always does.

Biden did that on his own at the last minute. Obama Admin approved of Shokin.

https://nypost.com/2023/08/23/team-obama-loved-victor-shokin-why-did-biden-get-him-fired/

And again, Hunter had ZERO business being on that board. Not experience in Ukraine and not experience in the natural gas industry. Quid Pro Joe, without a doubt, to anybody with even an ounce of common sense.

Biden didn't "do that on his own."

A NY Post opinion column? LOL. Come on dude. Can I quote Rachel Maddow to you now as evidence? You are being clownish.

Republican Senators were ALSO urging the Obama administration to pressure Ukraine to fire the Ukrainian prosecutor. Republican Sens. Rob Portman, Mark Kirk and Ron Johnson signed a letter in February 2016 urging the Obama administration to do just that. The letter was posted on the website of Republican Sen. Rob Portman.

B) John E. Herbst, the former Ambassador to Ukraine in the Bush administration testified in March 2016 to Congress that there was widespread support for the removal of the Ukrainian prosecutor Viktor Sholkin and offered praise for the Obama administration and Republican and Democrat Senators who were calling for his removal.

c) Alina Romanowski, who was nominated by Donald Trump to be ambassador to Kuwait testified in Congress and stated Ukraine did the right thing and "replaced a Prosecutor-General widely seen as corrupt.”


Lots of people don't have experience to do what they do when they are powerful people or know powerful people.

Should I start listing some of Trump's former ambassadors? Or any other Presidents that are clearly picked because of who they know, now what they know?

It's not illegal for a company to hire someone based on who they know. Never has been.
 
emails that say "big guy" aren't evidence Joe Biden did something illegal.

First, Joe Biden, like anyone else, was more than welcome to earn money while he was not in elected office.

Second, I can write an email saying the former CEO of my company was helping me out by cheating on my taxes. That doesn't mean he did it. Maybe I was trying to impress someone else. Maybe I was lying to show the CEO supported me when he didn't. But, that's not evidence. Even a high schooler knows this.

Evidence is records showing "the big guy" actually got money for favors while he was in elected office and proving that money was for something illegal.

If Republicans had that evidence, we'd have seen it long ago after years of investigation.

You are substituting what you want to be true with reality. No serious person takes that seriously.

No, it's common sense. And here's you evidence.

On August 8, 2017, Northern International Capital, a Chinese company affiliated with CEFC, sent $5 million to Hudson West III, a joint venture established by Hunter Biden and CEFC associate Gongwen Dong. That same day, Hudson West III sent $400,000 to Owasco, P.C., an entity owned and controlled by Hunter Biden. On August 14, 2017, Hunter Biden wired $150,000 to Lion Hall Group, a company owned by President Biden’s brother James and sister-in-law Sara Biden. On August 28, 2017, Sara Biden withdrew $50,000 in cash from Lion Hall Group. Later the same day, she deposited it into her and James Biden’s personal checking account. On September 3, 2017, Sara Biden cut a check to Joe Biden for $40,000 for a “loan repayment.”

Hunter got $400,000. Filtered the money thru the family and Joe got $40,000. 10% FOR THE BIG GUY.

Check-to-Joe-Biden-9.3.17.png


And there is ZERO paper trail for any "loan". The IRS mandates that any loan between family members be made with a signed written agreement, a fixed repayment schedule, and a minimum interest rate. Not of that exists. So not only are they getting paid by foreign entities, Mr. "Pay Your Fair Share" is likely cheating on his taxes. Again.
 
Like I said, you literally have the emails breaking down who was getting how much. 10% for the big guy.

And the texts complaining that he had to give daddy half his scam money.

Hunter-Biden-Text.jpg
Only a blind fool can't or won't see what was going on.


Emails aren't evidence of financial crimes.

I can write out some emails that make it seem like you cheated on your taxes. Doesn't mean you did it.

There is a reason Republicans haven't impeached Joe Biden over third party emails. Even they know it's not evidence of Joe Biden committing a crime.
 
Emails aren't evidence of financial crimes.

I can write out some emails that make it seem like you cheated on your taxes. Doesn't mean you did it.

There is a reason Republicans haven't impeached Joe Biden over third party emails. Even they know it's not evidence of Joe Biden committing a crime.

You see the check in my post. You see the amounts and who was paid. You see where the money came from. You see it added up to the 10% for the big guy. You don't see any of the required documentation of any loan ever existing.

And they haven't impeached him YET. There is plenty of evidence for anybody willing to open their eyes and look. You just don't want to look because you know exactly what was going on. Nobody is that dumb.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mikeypen
No, it's common sense. And here's you evidence.

On August 8, 2017, Northern International Capital, a Chinese company affiliated with CEFC, sent $5 million to Hudson West III, a joint venture established by Hunter Biden and CEFC associate Gongwen Dong. That same day, Hudson West III sent $400,000 to Owasco, P.C., an entity owned and controlled by Hunter Biden. On August 14, 2017, Hunter Biden wired $150,000 to Lion Hall Group, a company owned by President Biden’s brother James and sister-in-law Sara Biden. On August 28, 2017, Sara Biden withdrew $50,000 in cash from Lion Hall Group. Later the same day, she deposited it into her and James Biden’s personal checking account. On September 3, 2017, Sara Biden cut a check to Joe Biden for $40,000 for a “loan repayment.”

Hunter got $400,000. Filtered the money thru the family and Joe got $40,000. 10% FOR THE BIG GUY.

Check-to-Joe-Biden-9.3.17.png


And there is ZERO paper trail for any "loan". The IRS mandates that any loan between family members be made with a signed written agreement, a fixed repayment schedule, and a minimum interest rate. Not of that exists. So not only are they getting paid by foreign entities, Mr. "Pay Your Fair Share" is likely cheating on his taxes. Again.

This has already been debunked and is junk. I just wish nuts would stick to one theory, instead of throwing about 3 different ones against the wall. But it's you so it's no surprise.

"A check, for $40,000, was written by James Biden and his wife to Joe Biden in September 2017. On the back of that check, there is handwriting – with the president’s name Joseph R. Biden Jr., then a notation identifying Melvyn Monzack as Biden’s attorney-in-fact (which generally means a person who has been granted the right to act on behalf of someone else), then a stamp saying the money was deposited in an attorney trust account with a particular account number.

Though that account number the digits are the same as digits on the account that sent the $200,000 wire transfer to James Biden in early 2018.

In other words, the evidence suggests that the $200,000 that was sent to James Biden in January 2018 came from an account that belonged to Joe Biden when he was a private citizen."

Republican James Comer has emphasized that on the same day that James Biden wrote the $200,000 check to Joe Biden, James Biden received $200,000 from Americore Health, a financially troubled firm with which he had a business relationship; Comer has accused James Biden of engaging in “shady influence peddling” trading on the Biden name. But Comer has presented no evidence that Joe Biden was involved in his brother’s transactions with the company, let alone that Joe Biden undertook any official acts during his vice presidency or presidency to benefit his brother.
 
You see the check in my post. You see the amounts and who was paid. You see where the money came from. You see it added up to the 10% for the big guy. You don't see any of the required documentation of any loan ever existing.

And they haven't impeached him YET. There is plenty of evidence for anybody willing to open their eyes and look. You just don't want to look because you know exactly what was going on. Nobody is that dumb.


Oh, I see it. LOL

It's one of 3 different theories of the check that Republicans have put forth- without any evidence other than the made up stuff in their brains.

There is a reason- as I will keep repeating- that even some Republicans in the House and Senate have said they have seen no evidence to link Joe Biden to illegal activity.

If they had, there would be a vote. Instead, there hasn't been one.
 
Oh, I see it. LOL

It's one of 3 different theories of the check that Republicans have put forth- without any evidence other than the made up stuff in their brains.

There is a reason- as I will keep repeating- that even some Republicans in the House and Senate have said they have seen no evidence to link Joe Biden to illegal activity.

If they had, there would be a vote. Instead, there hasn't been one.

Not necessarily. Timing is everything.

Hunter got $400,000.
Sent $150,000 to James and Sara Biden.
Sara gave Joe $40,000.

What percentage ended up with Joe? 10% for the big guy?
 
Not necessarily. Timing is everything.

Hunter got $400,000.
Sent $150,000 to James and Sara Biden.
Sara gave Joe $40,000.

What percentage ended up with Joe? 10% for the big guy?


Funny how the numbers work out to 10%- but in the other scenarios Republicans were putting forward, it wasn't 10%- but then suddenly it was again. LOL

There is a reason- as I will keep repeating- that even some Republicans in the House and Senate have said they have seen no evidence to link Joe Biden to illegal activity.

If they had, there would be a vote. Instead, nope.
 
LOL

"Jordan was a dealt a major setback in recent weeks as the key whistleblower he had long touted as central to his allegations of corruption was indicted by the DOJ for lying to officials and admitted to prosecutors that the information he passed on to House Republicans came from Russian intelligence."

 
Last edited:
Funny how the numbers work out to 10%- but in the other scenarios Republicans were putting forward, it wasn't 10%- but then suddenly it was again. LOL

There is a reason- as I will keep repeating- that even some Republicans in the House and Senate have said they have seen no evidence to link Joe Biden to illegal activity.

If they had, there would be a vote. Instead, nope.
Are you still in favor of this trainwreck administration or are you just clinging to the fact they don't have a smoking gun against JB in the Burisma situation?
 
LOL

"Jordan was a dealt a major setback in recent weeks as the key whistleblower he had long touted as central to his allegations of corruption was indicted by the DOJ for lying to officials and admitted to prosecutors that the information he passed on to House Republicans came from Russian intelligence."


Of course Biden's justice department did that. He is the one that blew the whistle on his scheme. Put him in jail too so nobody can talk to him.

Putin level shit. Amazing how he went from one of the most trusted informants on the FBI payroll to jail because he blew the whistle.

Biden only hates Putin because he ain't Putin. But he is trying his best.
 
Funny how the numbers work out to 10%- but in the other scenarios Republicans were putting forward, it wasn't 10%- but then suddenly it was again. LOL

There is a reason- as I will keep repeating- that even some Republicans in the House and Senate have said they have seen no evidence to link Joe Biden to illegal activity.

If they had, there would be a vote. Instead, nope.

Not yet. Unlike Democrats, Republicans aren't going to rush it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cockofdawn
Are you still in favor of this trainwreck administration or are you just clinging to the fact they don't have a smoking gun against JB in the Burisma situation?

Dave Lemon is a crowd favorite here. He'll argue a lame position to death until he can no longer. With zero remorse or self-reflection, he'll then segway on to the next lame position du jour. He's our in-house Sphinx seated backwards. Fun for all ages.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: cockofdawn
No, it's common sense. And here's you evidence.

On August 8, 2017, Northern International Capital, a Chinese company affiliated with CEFC, sent $5 million to Hudson West III, a joint venture established by Hunter Biden and CEFC associate Gongwen Dong. That same day, Hudson West III sent $400,000 to Owasco, P.C., an entity owned and controlled by Hunter Biden. On August 14, 2017, Hunter Biden wired $150,000 to Lion Hall Group, a company owned by President Biden’s brother James and sister-in-law Sara Biden. On August 28, 2017, Sara Biden withdrew $50,000 in cash from Lion Hall Group. Later the same day, she deposited it into her and James Biden’s personal checking account. On September 3, 2017, Sara Biden cut a check to Joe Biden for $40,000 for a “loan repayment.”

Hunter got $400,000. Filtered the money thru the family and Joe got $40,000. 10% FOR THE BIG GUY.

Check-to-Joe-Biden-9.3.17.png


And there is ZERO paper trail for any "loan". The IRS mandates that any loan between family members be made with a signed written agreement, a fixed repayment schedule, and a minimum interest rate. Not of that exists. So not only are they getting paid by foreign entities, Mr. "Pay Your Fair Share" is likely cheating on his taxes. Again.
Rumor is Joseph R Biden did cut His Brother's yard for this $$$
 
  • Like
Reactions: mikeypen
Well, this is getting more interesting by the minute....The money movement evidence begins at the 2:15 mark.

Rep Byron Donalds outlines the money trail from CCP-controlled entity that eventually found its way to Joe Biden himself.

Money went from CCP, to Hunter Biden bank account, to James Biden bank account, eventually withdrawn by Sara Biden, and then given to Joe Biden.

Yikes.

 
  • Like
Reactions: cockofdawn
Not yet. Unlike Democrats, Republicans aren't going to rush it.


LOL. Quoting Gym Jordan from today I see when a Democrat made a motion for a vote to impeach and couldn't get any Republican to second the motion. That is hilarious.

They sure aren't in a rush. They've delayed it so much that they don't have the votes for it.
 
Are you still in favor of this trainwreck administration or are you just clinging to the fact they don't have a smoking gun against JB in the Burisma situation?


oh, I support Joe Biden over Donald Trump 100,000,000%. It's not even that close.

But, I wouldn't vote for either one of them if a gun was put to my head.

It's not a matter of clinging to anything.

I think Republicans should impeach Biden. It would help him politically, and it would help give Democrats the needed impetus to vote to impeach a Republican president the next time they control the House with a Republican president.

if Republicans had the evidence, they'd produce it and they'd have enough votes- without any Democrats- to vote for impeachment. But they don't have it- and they know it. That's why they haven't done anything about it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PaleoCock
Of course Biden's justice department did that. He is the one that blew the whistle on his scheme. Put him in jail too so nobody can talk to him.

Putin level shit. Amazing how he went from one of the most trusted informants on the FBI payroll to jail because he blew the whistle.

Biden only hates Putin because he ain't Putin. But he is trying his best.


That makes no sense. LOL

I mean, it could make sense if they just arrested him and put him in jail and no one could talk to him. But this isn't Russia. Arrested suspects can talk to people in the United States and this guy has talked.

But putting him in jail doesn't keep him from talking- or from people talking to him. LOL. That's not the way arrests work.

Plus, he's now admitted to his crime and turned over evidence- which Republicans on the House Judiciary and Intelligence Committee have seen and talked about.

If Gym Jordan thought he was arrested to shut him up (which doesn't make any sense anyway, but you said it), Jordan would be saying that and moving to try to prove such an allegation. But he's done the opposite. Even Gym hasn't accused the Department of Justice of that. That's because he knows that wouldn't make any sense.

You make up too much crazy stuff that not logical- and that the most nutty Republican House members and Senators aren't even saying.
 
oh, I support Joe Biden over Donald Trump 100,000,000%. It's not even that close.

But, I wouldn't vote for either one of them if a gun was put to my head.

It's not a matter of clinging to anything.

I think Republicans should impeach Biden. It would help him politically, and it would help give Democrats the needed impetus to vote to impeach a Republican president the next time they control the House with a Republican president.

if Republicans had the evidence, they'd produce it and they'd have enough votes- without any Democrats- to vote for impeachment. But they don't have it- and they know it. That's why they haven't done anything about it.
I can't imagine supporting these policies. Immigration alone is enough and that's the tip of the iceberg in terms of horrible decisions for our country. He passed 94 executive orders in the first 30 days of his term to trigger all of this. Even if you turn a head to the corruption, he's a terrible leader to the point it feels like he's doing it on purpose.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cockofdawn
That makes no sense. LOL

I mean, it could make sense if they just arrested him and put him in jail and no one could talk to him. But this isn't Russia. Arrested suspects can talk to people in the United States and this guy has talked.

But putting him in jail doesn't keep him from talking- or from people talking to him. LOL. That's not the way arrests work.

Plus, he's now admitted to his crime and turned over evidence- which Republicans on the House Judiciary and Intelligence Committee have seen and talked about.

If Gym Jordan thought he was arrested to shut him up (which doesn't make any sense anyway, but you said it), Jordan would be saying that and moving to try to prove such an allegation. But he's done the opposite. Even Gym hasn't accused the Department of Justice of that. That's because he knows that wouldn't make any sense.

You make up too much crazy stuff that not logical- and that the most nutty Republican House members and Senators aren't even saying.

He has NOT admitted anything other than talking to Russians, which was part of his job as an informant. He plead not guilty. FBI has known all this info for YEARS, but suddenly he is a liar when Biden is being investigated. This is info from 2015. And know for fact already the Hunter was getting millions from Burisma. That isn't even in dispute. And there is no reason for over 20 shell companies that did nothing but pass money around and provided no services at all. We KNOW Hunter was getting money from these companies that were getting money from countries everywhere, and we KNOW Hunter and Joe were sharing finances.

And let's not forget, these are some of the same folks that had Hunter's laptop, hide it for almost a year, and lied to everyone about it being "Russian propaganda". This is nothing more than a continuation of that lie.

You are a fool.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cockofdawn
LOL. Quoting Gym Jordan from today I see when a Democrat made a motion for a vote to impeach and couldn't get any Republican to second the motion. That is hilarious.

They sure aren't in a rush. They've delayed it so much that they don't have the votes for it.

That's stupid, not hilarious. Democrats don't control the House. Republicans will decide when the vote happens.

We need a nice, long investigation that keeps all of the Biden corruption in the news right up until election day so Americans can see just what a bunch of liars and crooks and Dems are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cockofdawn
I can't imagine supporting these policies. Immigration alone is enough and that's the tip of the iceberg in terms of horrible decisions for our country. He passed 94 executive orders in the first 30 days of his term to trigger all of this. Even if you turn a head to the corruption, he's a terrible leader to the point it feels like he's doing it on purpose.

1) I don't support all policies of anyone- any president, any local town official, any county official, anyone at all.

There are dozens of policies I don't support- but still prefer a particular candidate over someone else.

I won't vote for Joe Biden. But I wouldn't vote for Donald Trump either.

Congress has had numerous chances to fix immigration - both parties have failed repeatedly.

Donald Trump failed to get an immigration fix passed in Congress and relied on executive orders- many of which were struck down in federal court- some from sympathetic, Republican appointed judges because Congress hadn't approved the policy.

Over 1.3 million "illegals" entered our country in 2018 and 2019 alone- even with Trump's executive orders.

Now, that number is tiny compared to what has happened in Biden administration, but 1.3 million in 2 years is still a crap load of people.

So Trump didn't fix it. Bush tried like hell to fix it and couldn't. Obama deported a crap load of people who entered illegally and Republicans only trashed him for it.

As Ron DeSantis himself said- Obama deported more people in each of his terms than Trump did in his term.

But Obama didn't fix it. Trump didn't fix it.

Finally- FINALLY- WAY TOO LATE- Biden tried to get something passed in Congress that courts wouldn't be able to pause or kill- the first meaningful immigration changes since Ronald Reagan in the mid 1980s. Republicans killed it.
 
He has NOT admitted anything other than talking to Russians, which was part of his job as an informant.

Who cares what he pled.... - Hunter Biden pled not guilty in California to tax charges. Did that convince you he was not guilty? You make zero sense are totally inconsistent.

Smirnov told investigators after his arrest last week that “officials associated with Russian intelligence were involved in passing a story about Hunter Biden"

More interestingly, Republicans have largely quit talking about him or referring to him. even they know they were drinking the nonsense.
 
Last edited:
That's stupid, not hilarious. Democrats don't control the House. Republicans will decide when the vote happens.

We need a nice, long investigation that keeps all of the Biden corruption in the news right up until election day so Americans can see just what a bunch of liars and crooks and Dems are.


They've "decided" they won't vote at all because they can't convince their own members to vote for it. LOL

We've had a long investigation. This has been going on for years. Most Americans aren't paying attention to it.

Hell, even the Fox anchors are making fun of the hearings at this point saying they aren't producing any actual evidence, just repeating themselves over and over again.

It's comedy gold at this point.
 
oh, I support Joe Biden over Donald Trump 100,000,000%. It's not even that close.

But, I wouldn't vote for either one of them if a gun was put to my head.

It's not a matter of clinging to anything.

I think Republicans should impeach Biden. It would help him politically, and it would help give Democrats the needed impetus to vote to impeach a Republican president the next time they control the House with a Republican president.

if Republicans had the evidence, they'd produce it and they'd have enough votes- without any Democrats- to vote for impeachment. But they don't have it- and they know it. That's why they haven't done anything about it.
Then You sir are privileged,. I would support Wile E Coyote or the Banana Splits over this Administration. I am guessing your life, Good for you, is so much better under this crooked admin?? I know NOONE that is better off now, but then all my friends are like me, Middle Class hacks!!
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT