questionable. He had it when the foot came down. I would not call a ball changing hands as indisputable evidence of an incomplete pass. Just my opinion. I think an Alabama or Norte Dame receiver would have gotten the TD.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I agree. The fumble by Joyner though was a miscarriage of justiceIn my opinion, there really wasn't any doubt the call of incomplete was correct. The ball bounced in his hands and he didn't secure it until his foot was off the ground. His other foot then came down out of bounds. There were lots of bad calls by officials in this game, I just don't feel this was one of them.
I agree here, but Vann should have dragged his feet slightly and that is easily a TD. Vann looked to make a lazy catch and stay on his feet. He should have dragged his feet and let himself go down and it's a sure touch down.Vann call could have gone either way I thought. Agree Dak`s right knee clearly touched ground first.
I agree here, but Vann should have dragged his feet slightly and that is easily a TD. Vann looked to make a lazy catch and stay on his feet. He should have dragged his feet and let himself go down and it's a sure touch down.
I don't agree with the rule/refs logic on this one. I believe a catch is legitimate even if there is a little bit of jostling of the ball. I think its unrealistic to expect an instantaneous, tightly secured ball to be considered a "catch". My goodness, it was a fraction of a second after he caught the ball until he went OB. And the ball never came out. I mean, sheesh, what do they want?. That's petty.He bobbled the ball you have to maintain control to have possession. Unfortunately his foot was out after possession was obtained.
I don’t disagree with you but that’s not how the rule works and that’s not how it’s been called for at least 20 years. Per the rules it was incomplete.I don't agree with the rule/refs logic on this one. I believe a catch is legitimate even if there is a little bit of jostling of the ball. I think its unrealistic to expect an instantaneous, tightly secured ball to be considered a "catch". My goodness, it was a fraction of a second after he caught the ball until he went OB. And the ball never came out. I mean, sheesh, what do they want?. That's petty.
I know. I just think they need to be a little more lenient on the rule.I don’t disagree with you but that’s not how the rule works and that’s not how it’s been called for at least 20 years. Per the rules it was incomplete.
What fumble are you talking about? Or are you talking about vann bobbling the catch?If it was a fumble then isn’t it the last person to touch the ball before it goes out of bounds? I’m not sure if it was Carolina but it kinda looked like it
An incompletion is not a fumble. His foot was on the ground when he first caught it but it was already going back up when the defender's arm caused it to bobble. By the time he resecured it he was way out of bounds. But I thought it was a beautiful pass.If it was a fumble then isn’t it the last person to touch the ball before it goes out of bounds? I’m not sure if it was Carolina but it kinda looked like it
He juggled it. Incomplete.
It was ruled a fumble I thought.An incompletion is not a fumble. His foot was on the ground when he first caught it but it was already going back up when the defender's arm caused it to bobble. By the time he resecured it he was way out of bounds. But I thought it was a beautiful pass.
What fumble are you talking about? Or are you talking about vann bobbling the catch?yeah. I thought they ruled that a fumble but I guess I am wrong
I think we're talking about different plays. I missed the fumble in the 1st half. I almost missed the whole 1st half. As soon as I started watching we got a pick 6. I thought you were referring to the perfect pass to the endzone that was ruled incomplete. I'm sorry.It was ruled a fumble I thought.
Except that was not a juggle.