Many on here feel the same way about you, and that’s not a compliment.
That Duke possesses a historical recessive football gene capable of manifesting itself contemporarily in winning seasons, bowl bids, and conference championships.So were Rutgers, Harvard, and Yale. Your point?
That Duke possesses a historical recessive football gene capable of manifesting itself contemporarily in winning seasons, bowl bids, and conference championships.
I don't think the advantages associated with favorable schedules are exactly a revelation.That historical recessive gene that you refer to: Duke can be successful at times because of, wait for it, the schedule. You made my point.
I don't think the advantages associated with favorable schedules are exactly a revelation.
Always do.That was the entire point of the post. Keep up.
Sounds like us in the sec.Recruiting and expectations.
Tenn doesn't have a recruiting base within state in terms of number of blue chip talent. Fulmer had to recruit nationally and you still do now. It is tougher too. Much different than the luxury Florida and UGA have. Bama is also your permanent rival.
They expect national titles and competing with elite programs. It is a tough gig.
At Virginia, you just have to win more games than you lose (doable in the ACC), win 8 or 9 games every few years, beat Va Tech around 50% of the time and you'll have a job for life.
Many on here feel the same way about you, and that’s not a compliment.
Ok, hold on just a minute.So were Rutgers, Harvard, and Yale. Your point?
I'd imagine that he knew, along with all of us that UT lately is a complete clown show and steered clear away. He is hardly the one candidate who turned down that job.id imagine its because hes knows how hard it is to win in the SEC and how easy it is to win in the ACC. Simple as that.
Besides, what sane person would want to hear rocky top that much.
Elliott knows how things are at UT. The fan base views UT as a national power as they used to be. They will chew a coach up and spit him out. Virginia on the other hand has a much easier schedule, and if a coach comes in and wins 7-8 games consistently, they are more than happy with that. And if he happens to do better than that for a couple years in a row, it could be a stepping stone into one of the bigger jobs.
If you watched the game Saturday, you understand why UT is viewed as a sleeping giant. CJH was blown away by the atmosphere. Despite being irrelevant for 15 years, our tradition, history, and trophy case remain the envy of 95% of college programs. To think that Virginia? Is somehow in the same stratosphere is ludicrous. Tennessee has more money than anyone if they want to spend it.
Give it a couple years. They liked Butch Jones at one point too. Tennessee is fast approaching a quarter century since being relevant. And during their last two very recent coaching searches, they were turned down by enough coaches to field a baseball team.
Tennessee has been a huge disappointment for so long- so underachieving - a total mess in so many ways given what they were when people in their 50s and 60 were in college.
I don't make predictions for the future though.
That Duke possesses a historical recessive football gene capable of manifesting itself contemporarily in winning seasons, bowl bids, and conference championships.
Most on here? So like 8-10 people?The bigger question is, why would anyone go dig up a thread about Tony Elliott, UVA, and UT from December 2021 and move it back to the top of a Gamecock forum. If all three of these fall on their face….it will be fine with most on here.
I said what I said. Still not relevant.we won the east in 2007 so not quite 1/4 century? Exaggerate much? For a school that has been relevant on the national landscape very little, you sure do talk alot about the Vols.