ADVERTISEMENT

Back to back games for this coaching staff.....

Two good weeks for Beamer and Co. Have to give credit where it is due. Had a good game plan for Bama and had the team ready for both games. Our players were ready to eat nails today. Got that big lead and then didn't over think it or fk it up. Color me impressed. Well done.
To split those road games with a tight finish and blowout win was more than I expected. That type of defensive play will give us a chance in every remaining game. But let's not fall asleep after a bye week this time like we did against Ole Miss.
 
To split those road games with a tight finish and blowout win was more than I expected. That type of defensive play will give us a chance in every remaining game. But let's not fall asleep after a bye week this time like we did against Ole Miss.
Totally agree.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cockofdawn
Two good weeks for Beamer and Co. Have to give credit where it is due. Had a good game plan for Bama and had the team ready for both games. Our players were ready to eat nails today. Got that big lead and then didn't over think it or fk it up. Color me impressed. Well done.
The defense has been amazing. Dowell Loggains has lived up to being as good as advertised (e.g. disappointing). The offense is just painfully predictable.
 
If we don't lose Wells, Anderson, Jeter, etc. to the portal for this season, we're probably 6-1 or even 7-0 right now.

Loggains may not be the perfect fit. However, it's difficult to determine when you're losing your best talent

The idea that we're ever going to be consistent on offense with players being switched out yearly is a fallacy.

It's much different than revolving talent on defense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cockofdawn
If we don't lose Wells, Anderson, Jeter, etc. to the portal for this season, we're probably 6-1 or even 7-0 right now.

Loggains may not be the perfect fit. However, it's difficult to determine when you're losing your best talent

The idea that we're ever going to be consistent on offense with players being switched out yearly is a fallacy.

It's much different than revolving talent on defense.

Or if Oklahoma doesn't lose Dillon Gabriel we are 3-4.
 
What? Dillon Gabriel was literally their QB last year.


Or maybe you just make up fake facts to fit your narrative?

Ahh -- So it was UCF to OU to Oregon.

Doesn't really matter. They didn't lose him because money and one player likely isn't altering that complete blowout.

Please tell me you have something better than this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cockofdawn
Ahh -- So it was UCF to OU to Oregon.

Doesn't really matter. They didn't lose him because money and one player likely isn't altering that complete blowout.

Please tell me you have something better than this.

Very convenient. Crazy how every “fact” is the one most convenient for your argument.
 
If we don't lose Wells, Anderson, Jeter, etc. to the portal for this season, we're probably 6-1 or even 7-0 right now.

Loggains may not be the perfect fit. However, it's difficult to determine when you're losing your best talent

The idea that we're ever going to be consistent on offense with players being switched out yearly is a fallacy.

It's much different than revolving talent on defense.
I don’t think it’s that at all. We have the talent, I just think Dowell doesn’t understand calling plays. I think he understands the game but his management and timing isn’t there. I heard Sellers say “we use a lot of triple option”. I just don’t understand what his “system” is…
 
I don’t think it’s that at all. We have the talent, I just think Dowell doesn’t understand calling plays. I think he understands the game but his management and timing isn’t there. I heard Sellers say “we use a lot of triple option”. I just don’t understand what his “system” is…

Dunno. Outside of the raw talent of Sellers, I'm not sure we have any standouts on offense.

When an experienced Rattler arrived, he had seasoned/talented receivers like Wells, Legette, Knox, Bell, etc. and it still took him 3/4ths of a season to get in-sync on offense.

It was fashionable at the time to blame Satterfield for the anemic offense, but getting the timing/feel b/t a QR and his WR core takes time to develop.

And then look what happened when Wells, Knox, Bell, etc. weren't around for Rattler to throw to in 2023, back to that anemic offense. The only two on the same page were Rattler-Legette as they had played together the year prior.

We can't keep shuffling these guys who have to play in concert each season. It's a recipe for what we're looking at this year.

It makes it almost impossible to evaluate any OC on his own merit.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: PaleoCock
Dunno. Outside of the raw talent of Sellers, I'm not sure we have any standouts on offense.

When an experienced Rattler arrived, he had seasoned/talented receivers like Wells, Legette, Knox, Bell, etc. and it still took him 3/4ths of a season to get in-sync on offense.

It was fashionable at the time to blame Satterfield for the anemic offense, but getting the timing/feel b/t a QR and his WR core takes time to develop.

And then look what happened when Wells, Knox, Bell, etc. weren't around for Rattler to throw to in 2023, back to that anemic offense. The only two on the same page were Rattler-Legette as they had played together the year prior.

We can't keep shuffling these guys who have to play in concert each season. It's a recipe for what we're looking at this year.

It makes it almost impossible to evaluate any OC on his own merit.
Yeah, I agree to some extent. But, I feel like we don’t use our TE’s enough. Maybe they’re having to help block? But, look at Mazeo he didn’t touch the ball until the 3rd quarter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ward Jr
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT