I certainly am aware this thread and most of the comments are about a year old. But this exact thread could easily have been started just this past week. The comments are the same. The emotions are the same. Only the names have been changed, to protect the innocent.
What caught my eye were all these comments attempting to 'define history' and it's relationship to our basketball program, Frank Martin and program success or, lack there of, (whichever you prefer). While I do not agree, I can, at least, appreciate those who want to retain Frank Martin because of blind loyalty or, because of the amount of his buy-out or, even because the next young basketball coaching star, on the horizon, has not yet been clearly identified.
What I can not understand nor accept, for a single moment, is this pseudo argument that because our program has had less than stellar success on the hardwood (or has flat out sucked, whichever you prefer) that we should continue with the current leadership simply because some fear that things might not improve, we've sucked for decades and they don't want to start all over from the beginning, AGAIN.
Is that not the DEFINITION of ... Acceptance of Mediocrity?
