Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Belk Bowl is a blip on the data that leads to this ranking...The belk bowl continues to sting a little.
Are we really that shocked to be on this list? As a program, we are not much over .500 all-time.
So that chart is for what, the past 100 or more years? Where are we now or over the past ten years or so? A lot closer to the top 25 than the top 50. Recruits don't care what happened 30, 50, or 70 years ago, and I doubt many fans do either.Unacceptable? Nah. It is what it was. I for one refuse to cry over spilled milk.
Go Gamecocks.
So that chart is for what, the past 100 or more years? Where are we now or over the past ten years or so? A lot closer to the top 25 than the top 50. Recruits don't care what happened 30, 50, or 70 years ago, and I doubt many fans do either.
Except the milk has been spilt over our entire history as a program. It is unacceptable.Unacceptable? Nah. It is what it was. I for one refuse to cry over spilled milk.
Go Gamecocks.
?????lol @NC State
Anybody can have a bad century.Except the milk has been spilt over our entire history as a program. It is unacceptable.
He's a Tarhole.?????
Is this supposed to be sarcasm ?
They came in one spot better than us, not that's saying much, but that doesn't leave much room to stand on to diss NCSTU.
This just reaffirms why I don't watch ESPN for their commentary and couldn't care less about twitter.
My point is I have no interest in viewing or listening to some commentator's opinion of who the worst programs in history are. And it's crap like the list itself that tunes me right out.Lol.. this ain’t ESPN or Twitter’s fault. The results would be the same if they had been carved in a rock.
There are plenty more "blips" that went into that ranking.Belk Bowl is a blip on the data that leads to this ranking...
True, but I suppose there's a tendency to assume there as many programs above .500 as below, so we would end up somewhere in the middle. But it's obvious that the now-P5 programs were much better at beating up on the nobodies than we were back in the day.Are we really that shocked to be on this list? As a program, we are not much over .500 all-time.
Except the milk has been spilt over our entire history as a program. It is unacceptable.
Anybody can have a bad century.
Signed, UofSC football
And I hate to see our fanbase accept mediocrity.Then move on... I hate to see you suffer.
Be careful...truth doesn't fare well here.Lol.. this ain’t ESPN or Twitter’s fault. The results would be the same if they had been carved in a rock.
If this actually factors the entire history, I question the veracity of it. I look at, and compare random teams quite often on Winsipedia, and some people might be surprised at which teams are below .500, but not on this list, for example.....Miss. State, and a team that had maybe 1 winning season in the 25-30 years before George Welsh arrived, Virginia, but could still hit 700 wins before State hits 600. That’s actually an impressive win total considering the best football team of all time wasn’t even near 700 as recently as the first few years of the Dabo era, when they still wanted to fire him. Conversely, Nebraska, ND, Michigan, Bammer, Texas, OU are in the 900 club (or real close), and some of those blue bloods have been a shell of themselves for years.
We have a lot of strikes against us, and mostly self-inflicted, but I’d bet this da list is not one of them. If anything, our last 10-20 years would exclude us from this list. And, funny about Duke, and Vandy, but both are under .500 all time. Shocking.
That’s exactly what we do.And I hate to see our fanbase accept mediocrity.
Newberry has been Division II for as long as I can remember. Unless there is a different Newberry in Division I, I have never heard of it. It should not be on the list.That’s exactly what we do.
Good one!Anybody can have a bad century.
Signed, UofSC football
What would you do to take the "necessary" steps? Off Dabo....because I don't think he is going to get lazy and rest on his laurels like Spurrier did.@GeoCocky "I don't know about you, but I am even more outraged than before at our mediocrity!"
Yes, am getting tired of it especially since Clemson has proven that it can be done and in a supposedly BB conference. Even more sad is that Clemson was out recruiting and taking the necessary steps during USC's five game winning streak. Even the present state of USC FB could be called mediocre. Why should admin worry about whether or not USC has a GREAT FB team when fans show up for the games regardless and are the greatest excuse makers on planet earth? Things may be changing, tho. Don't think WB would be a sellout if 0-11. I hope so. Sparsely attended games may be the only way to get them to FOCUS and take the necessary steps to succeed.
Fans are taken for granted and the sorry outing in the Belk Bowl last season was an indicator.