“If you want to know what changes need to be made, I will refer you to an earlier post of mine.”
What did you mean by this quote?
I outlined a possible way to let WM go.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
“If you want to know what changes need to be made, I will refer you to an earlier post of mine.”
What did you mean by this quote?
I outlined a possible way to let WM go.
I fully agree with you. We Should never lose to a Group Of Five school, period!!Voluminous retort to have me say that, if APP State was better than us in any aspect, they shouldn't have been. If our strength and conditioning is substandard so that our injuries are excessive, it shouldn't be. We've been in the SEC long enough to never lose at home to a Group of Five school. Beyond that, Wolford's unit's output has been spotty at best. That is all for now.
How long has he been here? 4 years, I'll hold off on any possible negative opinions until the END of next year.
Why hold off for next year?? It is obvious the guy is a very poor HC - see UF and USC. That is 8 long years. Forget it.
Maybe there’s no other coaches on the market. Maybe the cost of the buyout is too excessive now. Maybe the pandemic has affected how business is being done. Maybe we will be in position to get a better hire next year.
Maybe there’s no other coaches on the market. Maybe the cost of the buyout is too excessive now. Maybe the pandemic has affected how business is being done. Maybe we will be in position to get a better hire next year.
I will reply to your post. But you need to read my reply and the post I was replying to. You misunderstood the context of my reply.
Now to your post. Yes, because of the pandemic we are forced to hold off. There are other coaches who will come if we can find an AD who has a vision and is willing to pay market.
Maybe the new hires turn out to be home runs and Muschamp and USC become the new Ed O. And LSU.Maybe there’s no other coaches on the market. Maybe the cost of the buyout is too excessive now. Maybe the pandemic has affected how business is being done. Maybe we will be in position to get a better hire next year.
What do you mean by willing to pay market and having a vision?
Are you for real?
No, you've done that plenty. But if really don't know what paying market value is, then you weren't just trolling when you said you didn't get my earlier analogy.
Silver_Coconut said: ↑I didn't ask what market value meant.
Yes, those were my words. Good job.
Thanks. It was actually pretty simple.Yes, those were my words. Good job.
Are you for real?
Not likely, but we can dream!!Maybe the new hires turn out to be home runs and Muschamp and USC become the new Ed O. And LSU.
What do you mean by willing to pay market value and having a vision? I’m legitimately curious what you mean. Unless that other guy speaks for you.
Do you know what a vision statement is? In this instance a vision to be a top notch athletic program in the SEC and nationally.
I am curious as to what you do to not understand what a vision for a college athletic program should be? Seriously why ask such a basic question? Are you being facetious?
I was just trying to get some insight into what you thought. So, how about market value. What would suggest there?
Why do you think PJ Fleck deserves that kind of contract?I would say in $5-6 million range for a coach like P.J. Fleck.
Is USCe a better job than Minnesota?I would say in $5-6 million range for a coach like P.J. Fleck.
Is USCe a better job than Minnesota?
Why do you think PJ Fleck deserves that kind of contract?
Is USCe a better job than Minnesota?
Of course. What do you mean?
You’re coming off as an asshole. Sorry had to say that.Just my take - but you are coming off like you don’t have a clue. Sorry, but I had to say that.
I thought Muschamp was a bad hire to begin with. So, I'm not surprised in the results. I did think when he was hired, that he would leave the next coach with a lot of talent. I was wrong about that. Consequently, Muschamp's recruiting has been the big disappointment in his time here. Thus, the Muschamp hire is looking to have been a monumental error in judgment.
I'm not so sure anymore.No comparison, much better.
I think the problem is that there was a shot at Lincoln Riley but the AD decided that he had to have someone with HC experience. That decision right there is enough to show he had no business as AD. If you aren’t interested in finding the right guy only what you think is a safe guy then you’re indicating your target is mediocrity.Who did you want to hire? I thought he was the best we could do, at the time. I don’t want to hear fairy tales about Tom Herman and Kirby Smart. Herman flat did not want to come here. No amount of money would have convinced him. Smart might have come here to wait for the GA job; But, Moma called. I am not sure who was available for us at that time. Maybe you can fill me in.
Riley's not a great head coach either, IMO (good-great OC) but Okie has a great program and he's not having to rebuild anything there.I think the problem is that there was a shot at Lincoln Riley but the AD decided that he had to have someone with HC experience. That decision right there is enough to show he had no business as AD. If you aren’t interested in finding the right guy only what you think is a safe guy then you’re indicating your target is mediocrity.
Maybe, maybe not. But I would take him and his offensive prowess any day over what we've sunken to under Muschamp.Riley's not a great head coach either, IMO (good-great OC) but Okie has a great program and he's not having to rebuild anything there.
You’re coming off as an asshole. Sorry had to say that.
Oh I will and I have. I just thought you’d be intellectual enough to share well thought out perspectives. Yet alas.Oh! Cmon now no need to be so touchy. Look at the questions that you keep asking? Vision, market value??? Should you not be able to figure this out yourself