That don’t mean that we don’t need a fresh new mind at OC
McClendon not the answer
- Thread starter GarnetCocky1
- Start date
That don’t mean that we don’t need a fresh new mind at OC
Those points we well made ...now, what is your basis for hitting an OC and your comprehensive explanation as to why you choice should be hired and a game by game explanation as to what his play calls have been and would be againstouropponrnts.
Didn’t Michigan benefit from short fields too? Wasn’t the Michigan almost win 99% defense 1% offense.
Great adjustments by BMac. We were getting destroyed up the middle, but he managed to find other ways to move the ball. In particular I loved the speed option that Dowdle scored on. Michigan was not expecting that call. Not sure how often we ran that play this season. I don't recall it working, if we did.
Those are talking points, not analytics. Let’s abandon the 15 second double bite explanation and get down tom true explanation. Who do you want and give me a game time analysis of what they offer rather than canned stats.
What the hell are you talking about? I know you’re a Roper Homer but Jesus Christ, Bmac made the needed adjustments at the half and it showed in tbe final score. Roper would still be trying to score his first TD. BMac did in 1 game and only 1 month of coaching the offense what Roper couldn’t do in 2 years. Beat a top 5 defense.
Pure speculation on your part. BMac was also given a very short field on those "drives."
Mac had what, ten practices? How much of a change could he REALISTICALLY make? Still no Deebo playing. He definitely made halftime adjustments. What could he have done better. 3 second half touchdowns and a solid offense in the 4th quarter is the definition of adjusting to win. Tell me what he did wrong.
Kinda torn . What I saw today was an elite defense loaded with NFL players against a totally overmatched offense . Not sure any schemes would fix that . I thought Mclendon made two very good calls ..... the boundary option for a TD , and calling the quick strike TD to Edwards after the turnover . So many times this year we would get big turnovers and Roper would call a zone read or bubble screen for negative yards . Our OL was totally manhandled all day long . No matter what OC we bring in , nothing changes until we get more talent . I say give him a shot . He’s a dynamic recruiter and that is half the battle .
No, we just need to shoot for a OC that can get us up to the top 50 like some coaches on this board say.
Dats jus stoopid
I think some of y'all don't realize our best years with Spurrier were average offenses and an outstanding defense. Sure, I would love to have a Top 10 offense and a great defense but that needs to come through recruiting, not by some gimmicky HUNH OC hire. That offense has been shown to have a negative influence on the defense.
Let's shoot for a Top 50 offense next year with BMac and work our up from there.
What other schools are looking for an OC right now? I'm concerned that if we don't make BMac the OC, we could lose him to another school willing to make him theirs. He's an attractive candidate. He's stepped up in two bowl games now and he's one of the best recruiters in the country.
Ok how do you account for Clemson success...yeah they had am all world qb last year but 90 plus plays last year had them about to pass out,they still have. Great d
oneski MMember
↑
No, we just need to shoot for a OC that can get us up to the top 50 like some coaches on this board say.
Dats jus stoopid
I think some of y'all don't realize our best years with Spurrier were average offenses and an outstanding defense. Sure, I would love to have a Top 10 offense and a great defense but that needs to come through recruiting, not by some gimmicky HUNH OC hire. That offense has been shown to have a negative influence on the defense.
Let's shoot for a Top 50 offense next year with BMac and work our up from there.
You’re lost! Did you watch us play offense in the first half? We need an experienced play-caller. BMac doesn’t have it.
↑
No, we just need to shoot for a OC that can get us up to the top 50 like some coaches on this board say.
Dats jus stoopid
I think some of y'all don't realize our best years with Spurrier were average offenses and an outstanding defense. Sure, I would love to have a Top 10 offense and a great defense but that needs to come through recruiting, not by some gimmicky HUNH OC hire. That offense has been shown to have a negative influence on the defense.
Let's shoot for a Top 50 offense next year with BMac and work our up from there.
You’re lost! Did you watch us play offense in the first half? We need an experienced play-caller. BMac doesn’t have it.
Wow! You're judging BMac on the first half of offense he's ever called and against the #3 defense no less. On the whole, BMac did a great job today.
Great? Lol ok. He benefited from 5 second half turnovers. Don't go crazy smh
