Muschamp has his OC.
- Thread starter GamecockJL
- Start date
If Bmac gets it done Champ will come out smelling like Roses . If he flops he will get crushed for hiring a guy with zero exp given his track record of ineptitude on offense . It’s a gutsy hire . If he hires him simply because he doesn’t want him to leave then that’s a weak move . This hire will make or break Muschamp . Did he do a fantastic job going 9-4 this year ?? Absolutely . But we all know that 5 or 6 years ago when the east was strong , this current squad would have been lucky to win 3 games . Kirby is setting UGA up to be the Bama of the east , UF will be a powerhouse again very soon and UT ... well they are a train wreck . We can’t beat Kentucky , Missou is a DC away from being terrifying. He can’t screw the pooch on this one
If the decision is made, I will support Muschamp in his choice. In a year we will all know if it was a good choice. As an optimist and a Gamecock, I hope am hopefully looking forward to saying kudos to Coach.
I just wanted to keep him for recruiting. Not crazy about him being OC (if he gets it) but I'd consider it an upgrade over Roper(take that for what it's worth).
One game doesn't prove it. I just hope he's a real student of the game, if so, things might turn out alright.
I've made my opinion clear about this hire...but i wish him well
what are you talking about....oh, yeah, if you havent heard BMAC is OC at SC
Why don’t we wait and see what Muschamp has to say tomorrow making too many assumptions. He may surprise you
Hope he shows up with a duffle bag and pulls a hat out of the bag with the name on it. The kids think it’s cute.
Got to trust Muschamp. Am sure he put more thought into this than any other hire he has made. His future as a head coach at a Power 5 level probably depends on it. Kirby has it going at UGA. Mullen will get UF back amongst the elite. No matter how much we take UK for granted every year, we can’t seem to beat them. Glad we played Mizzou at the first of the year. Pruitt will get UT going again. Good coach and knows the Bama way just like Kirby. So Muschamp better get it right. Everybody else seems to be improving and USC has to keep pace.
We need recruits more than we need playcalling right now
BMac can make that happen for us
Plus, I thought he had as playing well in the bowl game
BMac can make that happen for us
Plus, I thought he had as playing well in the bowl game
Listen this is a good hire, Bmac was shaky at best with the calls in the first half but dont think turnovers got us all of those points. We had some really good drives against the #3 ranked defense in the country when Bmac figured it out
3rd Quarter
8 Play 87 yard drive-TD
1 Play 21 yard TD
4th Quarter
6 play 81 yard drive-TD
7 Play 46 yard drive- FG- Ran 4 minutes off the clock
If its BMAC I'm giving him the support he deserves, lets see what he can do with a whole spring and summer under his belt.
3rd Quarter
8 Play 87 yard drive-TD
1 Play 21 yard TD
4th Quarter
6 play 81 yard drive-TD
7 Play 46 yard drive- FG- Ran 4 minutes off the clock
If its BMAC I'm giving him the support he deserves, lets see what he can do with a whole spring and summer under his belt.
Nope.
However to only pay attention to one half is ignorant. That was the FIRST HALF against one of the best defenses in the nation... Typically when playing a stout D, you expect to get more in the second half as you wear them down and figure them out a bit, and clearly some adjustments made by the OC paid off with 23 unanswered points to win the game. Yards don't mean shit, WINS DO.
Additionally, Bentley played pretty awful in the first half... one of the quotes in an article on this site said a player (forget who) came up to him and said something along the lines of "where is the QB who leads us in practice, where is your confidence..." and it kind of snapped Jake out of his funk. He played like an All American the last 20 minutes of the game. If he plays that way the whole game, we win by three or four TDs! There were some decent plays called in the first half that were poorly executed... there were also some really awful play calls in the game, just saying...
ell-Known Member
New
↑
88 yards in a half...is playing well?
Nope.
However to only pay attention to one half is ignorant. That was the FIRST HALF against one of the best defenses in the nation... Typically when playing a stout D, you expect to get more in the second half as you wear them down and figure them out a bit, and clearly some adjustments made by the OC paid off with 23 unanswered points to win the game. Yards don't mean shit, WINS DO.
Additionally, Bentley played pretty awful in the first half... one of the quotes in an article on this site said a player (forget who) came up to him and said something along the lines of "where is the QB who leads us in practice, where is your confidence..." and it kind of snapped Jake out of his funk. He played like an All American the last 20 minutes of the game. If he plays that way the whole game, we win by three or four TDs! There were some decent plays called in the first half that were poorly executed... there were also some really awful play calls in the game, just saying...
66 1 minute ago
That’s no different than Roper...It’s also ignorant to ignore, that Michigan turned the ball over 5 times in the 2nd half. I didn’t see any difference in our offense from the previous 12 games. I fear this is going to fail!
New
↑
88 yards in a half...is playing well?
Nope.
However to only pay attention to one half is ignorant. That was the FIRST HALF against one of the best defenses in the nation... Typically when playing a stout D, you expect to get more in the second half as you wear them down and figure them out a bit, and clearly some adjustments made by the OC paid off with 23 unanswered points to win the game. Yards don't mean shit, WINS DO.
Additionally, Bentley played pretty awful in the first half... one of the quotes in an article on this site said a player (forget who) came up to him and said something along the lines of "where is the QB who leads us in practice, where is your confidence..." and it kind of snapped Jake out of his funk. He played like an All American the last 20 minutes of the game. If he plays that way the whole game, we win by three or four TDs! There were some decent plays called in the first half that were poorly executed... there were also some really awful play calls in the game, just saying...
66 1 minute ago
That’s no different than Roper...It’s also ignorant to ignore, that Michigan turned the ball over 5 times in the 2nd half. I didn’t see any difference in our offense from the previous 12 games. I fear this is going to fail!
Bmac was part of the offensive problem all year. That can’t be ignored either.
Typical Muschamp hire. Typical gamecock hire. Lazy. Easy. Buddy system
BMac will stop being the recruiter he has been when he has OC duties to contend with. The likely outcome will be we lose our best recruiter and have a OC learning on the job. Most likely a disaster.
Well, we will certainly know if BMAC was a good hire as OC by game 3 next season. My measuring stick consists of beating UK, no stupid run plays up the middle, no passing plays in short yardage situations on 3rd & 4th down, and getting our total offensive statistic in the top 50.
To use the word ignorant again- saying it was the same as Roper is pretty ignorant! The play calls, tempo, and alignments were quite different from Roper’s edp. We scored more total points than most teams vs Michigan, hand more passing yards than most and won the game, so the offense was effective to a degree.
That said, I am not some Bmac super fan... I do not know any more than any one else about how well he will do as OC. Hell, the players and everyone around the team may be wrong, maybe muschamp is stealing the OC from the New England Patriots! My point was that stats can say anything you want them to if you isolate them down enough- want to be negative about our offense from that game? Point to “88 yards in the first half” or “5 turnovers”... want to view the whole picture, compare our GAME stats to what Michigan has allowed to other teams this season... turnovers or not, we scored when we had to, we moved the ball and clealry made some fantastic adjustments in the second half. You cannot judge an OC by stuff he cannot control like turnovers caused by our D. We will know soon enough who got the job. I just want us to be successful regardless.
Now when BMAC hits the recruiting trail he can tell offensive players he is the OC and the vision for his offense. IMO we will start to get more top rated explosive players on the offensive side of the ball.
Similar threads
