Not only are our coaches bad they’re poor at identifying talent and spending NIL money.
Poorly coached
- Thread starter USCMBA77
- Start date
Not only are our coaches bad they’re poor at identifying talent and spending NIL money.
You can say that about nearly every USC coach for the past 60 years. So really nothing different now.
As even Ellis Johnson said a few weeks ago to Phil Kornblut- that he was pretty lucky when he was at USC that we had some huge difference makers right here in South Carolina that were interested in coming here- and that window was a small window- that closed even while Spurrier was still here.
Such an odd argument when the reasonable person would say Chadwell and Riley are better than Beamer and Loggains.
We’ve been bad for 60 years because we keep hiring bad coaches like Beamer.
No foresight to hire a Kiffen or Freeze.
Interesting that you remember that. Being the tater you are, must have hurt.
We saw what happened when they played somebody.
Funny that you are delusional enough to think that either would have EVER consider coming here. We couldn't even get Napier to leave Louisiana to come here.
Ole Miss is one of the few SEC schools we were considered a better job than.
No idea why you guys try to lie about stuff to prove your point.
We were clearly the better job versus Ole Miss until we started to suck which coincided with us hiring Muschamp and Beamer while they had Freeze and Kiffin.
You mean Freeze that got Ole Miss in all kinds of trouble. And Kiffin that said South Carolina players end up pumping gas for a living.
Like I said, we couldn't even get Napier to leave Louisiana to come here. BOTH knew they had better options that SC. Even Rich Rod supposedly turned us down.
Delusions of grandeur.
Last edited:
What's your metric?
The fact the Ole Ball Coach wanted to see if he could somewhere most deemed unwinnable?
That's called an aberration.
Yeah, he is pretty much a young spurrier type mouth.
I wish we had him as a coach.
I’ll never understand thinking so little of your favorite school.
Why even be a fan if you’re just going to think “we have to suck”
Nobody ever said that. The answer is money. Send some or STFU.
Crying like a little bitch on the internet 24/7 about coaches that would never consider us sure as hell won't get it done.
Does crying about money on the internet 24/7 get it done?
Maybe you should actually start giving some.
I'm in my second year of giving to the Garnet Trust. I don't give a lot, but I give more than the minimum.
If it is really so important to you howling monkeys that you are willing to cry 24/7/365, put your money where your mouth is. Maybe it will help.
If it is really so important to you howling monkeys that you are willing to cry 24/7/365, put your money where your mouth is. Maybe it will help.
Yeah, you SAY that on an anonymous message board. But that doesn't count for much.
As much as you cry like a baby 24/7/365 about NIL, you should think about actually giving money.
Yeah, not a lot of those guy wanting a challenge anymore. Most are looking for the best situation possible. Don't see that being us for any hot name coach.
No one would have called Ole Miss the best situation possible but they took the risk on a great coach with some baggage. Look at them and look at us.
Any metric you can want to use.
From 02-15ish we out recruited them 75% of the time.
Financial Comparison: SEC Operational Budgets 2004-2005 to 2009-2010
Financial Comparison: ACC Operational Budgets 2004-2005 to 2009-2010
www.shakinthesouthland.com
We had 18 million more in revenue the year before Spurrier. By 08-09 we had 35 million more in revenue.
The only thing they've been better at us in is hiring coaches since the 2010s.
