Clemson is on very solid ground and it all started with
- Thread starter Cock_Donor
- Start date
Who would have thought this? I knew they had talent and a lot of young players but did not see this coming. Can't believe how this season has turned out. Is it baseball season yet?
Some do but I don't see the point. What's the point? To make us feel bad about ourselves? I don't get it
I see what you are saying, but 36 straight is hard to do. They've been consistent gotta give it to the taters
Heck, this is better than the Chic Fil-a Natty Championship Dabo proclaimed several years back. However, when the Taters drop the ball, Dabs will have to answer that question again about "Clemsoning".
To be honest, they are catching everyone in either a down year or with a major injury. ND played with a back up QB, GT sucks & everyone else in the ACC is average at best besides FSU & they don't appear to be really good this year. I'm surprised they got ranked that high seeing how they've only beates 1 ranked team this season. I hope they lose before the end of the season.
Serious, Clemson took Georgia off there schedule and the first few games were cake walk. Look at our schedule for next year. We can't get a break. We are the only SEC school starting out with SEC play
What is up with that?
What is up with that?
That's a pretty nifty trick that USC is the only SEC school starting out with an SEC game.
Like you, I agree that you must recruit the 4 and 5 star kids consistently to be good year in and year out. However, Connor Mitch was a 4 star I believe (and considered a huge get). I believe that Smelley was also highly sought after and highly regarded. We do recruit too many hopeful "diamonds in the rough", but with the exception of the Lattis, Hollomans, Gilmores, Clowney's, etc, we haven't gotten a lot out of our big recruits. We seemed to have gotten more mileage out of the three stars that came to work. When and if we do get 4 and 5 stars, they need to produce like a 4 or 5 star should.
I don't know what this has to do with this thread but we need Tom Herman.
I agree. It's not fair that all 13 other SEC teams are playing easy non-conference games, and USC has to start off with an SEC team. We should write a letter.
There's a new definition to that word. Watch espn lately? After 36 in a row over unranked teams and 17 of last 18 overall. Not to mention wins over LSU, Georgia, Oklahoma, Ohio State, Notre dame, Auburn , Florida State ........
Give it up. The idiots that coined the word changed the definition. Haven't lost to unranked team since 2011. If we lose this weekend or any other it will be because the other team outplayed us that day. That happens across the board every week in college football. Hasn't happened to Clemson in 4 years against a inferior team. Alabama is the only other team that can claim that.
Give it up. The idiots that coined the word changed the definition. Haven't lost to unranked team since 2011. If we lose this weekend or any other it will be because the other team outplayed us that day. That happens across the board every week in college football. Hasn't happened to Clemson in 4 years against a inferior team. Alabama is the only other team that can claim that.
They own one and just bought another one.
http://www.greenvilleonline.com/sto...on-university-citation-business-jet/26176477/
Florida has a road loss to #2 LSU. Bama has a home loss to Ole Miss, who Florida beat.
.
Who cares? Bama and LSU play Saturday.
Nice, try but clemsuxing still means loser. #clemsuxing was the #1 trending tweet on twitter just 12 months ago. As much as you'd like to try & convince everyone clemsux is over pulling a clemsux....ya'll arent. There's a #clemsuxing on the horizon! Hopefully a reporter can ask dumbo about it again & watch him go nuts over "that word". HAHAHA!!! Cant wait!
I wonder what you will say if we end up 15-0 with a national title. What then? The rest of the college football world thinks there's a real chance in that happening. You had better get used to this because it's not changing anytime soon
It does suck, I'd be lying if I said otherwise. However, I'll be pulling for every single team you play in the hopes that Clemson craps the bed on the big stage in the most embarrassing way. Nothing short of ripping the heart out of every single fan that wears the orange.
Cocky kebo57
Well-Known Member
clemmons will lose a game at some point, the only question is when? NO team EVER wins every game they play. Who knows, Watson might get injured their first possession of the game against FSU and get knocked out a couple games. That would certainly derail all this title talk they have going on.
A real Gamecock never says never when it's against Clemson or anybody else. I'll walk into WB on Nov 28 and the score will be 0-0. With all my might I'll be hoping we can score the most points that day. Isn't that who gets the W?
At some point everyone loses, but wouldn't you like to be in the conversation right now for a chance at the playoffs? BTW all this talk of not playing anyone is garbage. Better go check the stats and re-listen to the playoff show
Once you get on the perch, there's only one way to go Tiger. How much cash did those 42 freshmen get under the tiger table? Don't come on this site and get all high and mighty.
You all have to understand something. I LIVE in the upstate. Clemson fans are serious about Clemson football and they will write a letter. These fans don't want to play Georgia or a tough SEC school but play an easy schedule, contact ESPN sports people, complained about how they should be this or that, and these fans don't accept no. An easy schedule and a easy door to the playoffs. I work with Clemson fans and they say that they don't want to play an SEC schedule. You can't win. Easier schedule, guarantees and bowl game.
Who's comparing clemson to Alabama? Clemson has quite a ways to go before that can even be a thought.
